That would also result in wine being more environmentally friendly. Shipping liquid in heavy glass bottles is a carbon footprint nightmare, so people should be drinking wine as locally produced as possible.
Unsurprisingly, that doesn’t seem to be true, but also the studies seem to arrive at pretty different numbers about how much worse it is.
Some authors, such as Neto et al. (2013), show that the distribution of wine has a relatively small impact of 1.9% (0.05 kg CO2e/bottle of 750 ml) relative to the viticulture and wine bottling stages in the supply chain. Others, such as Bonamente et al. (2016), estimate the distribution of bottled wine to represent approximately 41.1% of the total life cycle emissions of wine at consumption.
Exactly. Even in the worst case, it’s better to ship a bottle of wine from California to Canada, than try to use greenhouses to make a Canadian winery a reality.
Someone should tell Trump tariffs on French wine will just boost sales of California wine. Maybe he hates California enough to back off.
That would also result in wine being more environmentally friendly. Shipping liquid in heavy glass bottles is a carbon footprint nightmare, so people should be drinking wine as locally produced as possible.
Nah, humanity is really good at shipping. Locally sourced wine is only environmentally friendlier than shipping if you happen to live in a vintner.
Unsurprisingly, that doesn’t seem to be true, but also the studies seem to arrive at pretty different numbers about how much worse it is.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539526000866#t0005
Exactly. Even in the worst case, it’s better to ship a bottle of wine from California to Canada, than try to use greenhouses to make a Canadian winery a reality.