Be civil and follow principle of charity in the comments.

    • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Cool idea: don’t presuppose what literally every human needs based on your narrow worldview. Without significant animal fat and protein I wouldn’t be able live.

      No, I’m not going to get into specifics, but also, no, I cannot get my current nutritional needs (and still desire to eat) by cutting animal products and biproducts in my diet.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      No one has to eat meat

      People with crohn’s or colostomy bags would disagree.

      in fact with all the space used for animals we could produce way more food instead.

      The space used for animals is grassland and doesn’t have the right soil to be cropland. i.e. if all animals disappeared tomorrow we wouldn’t get any more cropland at all.

      • RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        With one exception being the animals that are fed with crops.

        We wouldn’t grow more crops in total, but more would be available for human consumption.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          We wouldn’t grow more crops in total, but more would be available for human consumption.

          The bulk of animal food from crops isn’t human edible, i.e. the leftover waste. Cows have an amazing ruminant digestive system that can process plant food that humans can’t!