• Liana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s quite thin for aluminum, and the downside with glass is the high energy cost of melting it. I’d like if we went back to washing and reusing bottles, but I suppose that’s a big shift in processing capabilities.

    • EarJava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Not 100% win though:

      Glass bottles of lemonade, iced tea, soft drinks and beer contained on average around 100 microplastic particles per litre, which is between five and 50 times more than plastic bottles or cans. Source

      • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Forgive any ignorance or arrogance on my part, I’m not a materials scientist at all, but wouldn’t the plastic caps on plastic bottles also have the same deleterious effect?

        I didn’t read anything in there about them exploring the source of the plastic particulates in plastic bottles. Whether from the bottle or from the cap too.

        • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The cap is actually much worse than the bottle because the mechanical twisting motion abrades the surfaces, so yes it turns yes out you can badly contaminate a whole bottle of liquid with a simple bottlecap.