• starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      I distinctly remember writing some report about taxation without representation, thinking it was some super important American principle. I was real confused when I learned about Puerto Rico

        • Varpeggio@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Wait, why?! DC doesn’t get proper representation. Or are you joking?

          In any case, to say the people of the 50 states are adequately represented is foolish.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            DC isn’t a state or in one. The original idea was that it wouldn’t be a meaningful permanent residence, but as the federal government grew it became a real major city with a lot of permanent residents.

            They have 1 non voting representative, no presence in the senate, and starting in 1961 they’ve had 3 electoral votes for president.

            Oh also in 1973 they were granted the right to elect a mayor and city council rather than being directly governed by the federal government. The federal government still has the constitutional power to overrule them and has done so several times.

            DC wants statehood, and I generally support it (alongside Puerto Rican statehood), but for DC even just giving them a single senator, true home rule off federal land, voting representatives proportional to population, and the ability to gain electoral votes as population grows would be huge.

          • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            DC, Puerto Rico, Samoa, Virgin Islands and Mariana Islands all pay taxes and have zero representation in congress.