Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agoDare to dreamlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up11.17Karrow-down120
arrow-up11.15Karrow-down1imageDare to dreamlemmy.dbzer0.comViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-squareDpek@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoIt had reminded me of my old laptop which wouldnt boot if it had more then 4 gb of ram It may have been 32 bit (dont remember the exact model and no longer have it) or it may have been due to mismatched sticks
minus-squareBuddahriffic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days ago4GB is the 32-bit address space. You could be right. My thought was that there wasn’t really a technical reason to not boot with more RAM than is addressable, but it’s certainly possible that BIOS/firmware or even the OS treated it as a fatal error.
It had reminded me of my old laptop which wouldnt boot if it had more then 4 gb of ram
It may have been 32 bit (dont remember the exact model and no longer have it) or it may have been due to mismatched sticks
4GB is the 32-bit address space. You could be right. My thought was that there wasn’t really a technical reason to not boot with more RAM than is addressable, but it’s certainly possible that BIOS/firmware or even the OS treated it as a fatal error.