“Harvard scientist Rachel Greene”

Everyone’s happy

What a terrible day to be literate

oh yeah, just giving in to opression is easier than fighting it, ain’t it?

They are more similar that at least I used to think.

https://youtu.be/bt7nC52GrmM

I am squarely on the reddit should lose this side.

Anthropic may be breaking copyright, but not Reddit’s copyright. Sure maybe Anthropic should be sued, but not by Reddit.

sure, but a large one?

Looks awesome. And I’m not even British.

It also looks like a heart attack, but so does hamburgers

…good.

Shit in My Hands?

wait D was not the correct answer?

For search I’m really happy with Kagi

I am optimistic about self driving, just not Teslas. Unlike other self driving cars, Tesla is exlusively reliant on cameras. Others, like Waymo, have cameras, lidarr sensors and radar.

dicks out

You don’t need to be a journalist to copy/paste a title verbatim

4.5% of the population are psychopaths. 1.4% have a degree in maths.

coincidence?

The majority of the rest of the world has 220-230v per phase, with three phases. using all three phases gives you access to ~400v

neither are cartilages, yet they’re a part of the skeleton

???

Now I want to know what flibbar is

Yup. I don’t think training should be considered breaking copyright. Regurgitating though should.

There are examples of use cases besides the right now obvious one of LLMs “creating” “original” content.

One that comes to my mind is indexing books. Allowing for people to search for books based on a description.

On the other hand, it is not the learning in your example that is illegal, but the recital.

If you learn ten books by heart and make money writing shitty fanfics, thats not necessarily illegal.