• 1 Post
  • 283 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle
  • Agreed, but with a few provisos.

    Turning a peaceful protest (march etc) violet is a big no no. If there is seen to be a risk of this, the popularist section will rapidly hemorrhage members. The radicals can use the events as cover/meeting new members, but not go hot on the march. The exception to this is if the government/police go violent. Defensive counter violence is then acceptable. The goal should be to get the “civilian” supporters (think families etc) clear. Then, it’s down to them whether they bolt too, or play whack a mole with the police.

    The other proviso is that the radical groups actions should be proportional. The IRA walked this line. When they set major bombs, they gave the authorities enough warning to clear the area of civilians. They were mostly aiming for property damage and disruption, not mass casualties. The times the IRA went past that line did severe damage to their reputation. They need to act to reinforce the position of the other 2 groups, not undermine it.


  • For best results, you need a trifacta.

    A popularist movement is core. This should be non-violent and as welcoming to new members as possible.

    A political group then acts as a focus for the group. It translates the mob grievances into politically actionable demands.

    A radical group acts as the teeth. It forces the government to take proper notice of the other 2 groups.

    The Irish troubles would be a good example. The popular movement was ignored by the UK government. It bubbles over into riots etc at times, which actually hurt their message in many ways. The Sinn Féin party focused the discontent and gave the UK government someone to negotiate with. Finally the IRA provided the force on the UK government.

    Take away any leg and the whole movement stutters. If the popularist wing gets violent, then it bleeds members fast. Without a political wing, the movement is unfocused and will achieve nothing. The violent wing can be dropped IF there is sufficient threat of its existence/creation to keep governments motivated. Unfortunately, most governments that let things escalate that far will just dig in their heels, rather than do the sensible thing.






  • I hate to be “that guy” but be very careful throwing sticks for dogs. I know several vets and throat damage from sticks is a depressingly common injury for dogs.

    The dog races after the stick, and it bounces weirdly. Rather than grabbing it in the middle, the tip goes into their mouth. Their own momentum then impales them on it. It’s a major surgery to remove it and repair the damage (assuming the dog survives).

    Balls are a lot safer, and go a LOT further, particularly with a ball thrower.






  • That’s fair. However, a lot of it is already in place and is quite automated. E.g. on busses they have a contactless card reader. Many have already moved to a fixed ride fee too. Basically you just tap as you walk past the driver, who already has to be there.

    The London underground has intermittent enforcement. A lot of the time the honour system is all there is. You just swipe your oyster card or bank card at the read point next to the entrance. They do random checks just to keep people honest.

    Even if you expand things, the cost of the tech is low enough to almost be a rounding error.

    The goal is to limit completely frivolous usage saturating capacity or otherwise forcing the target riders off completely.


  • cynar@lemmy.worldtoADHD@lemmy.worldIt's a struggle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    As far as I’m aware, it’s down to our homeostatic systems. They try and keep our bodies (and minds) in proper balance. When someone takes a drug, it pushes things out of “balance”. The homeostatic systems respond by adjusting other hormones etc to compensate. Eventually, you need more to get high, or some to feel normal. Not taking it, and the homeostatic systems overcompensate, leading to withdrawal symptoms.

    With ADHD. The brain chemistry is out of balance already. The homeostatic systems try and respond, but can’t get far enough. We experience it as a need/craving for anything that produces dopamine.

    When we take medication, it kicks out whole brain, with a focus on the executive functions. This takes the pressure off the homeostatic responses and let’s up operate in a calm state. The homeostatic systems also counter the various “side effects”. These are more minor than the main effect, and so have FAR less noticeable withdrawal symptoms. E.g. for me my appetite overshoots when I forget my meds. It’s technically withdrawal, but not really noticeable most of the time.


  • cynar@lemmy.worldtoADHD@lemmy.worldIt's a struggle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m guessing you’ve stumbled in here from /all. ADHD fucks with particular mental processes and patterns. Making a monthly detour for our medication is a hard pattern to lock in. When it fails, it can throw everything else into a spin.

    Could we do it, yes. It would be in trade for something else, mental energy wise. Most of us are pissed at having to spend our most valuable resource, mental energy (executive focus particularly) on a task that could be made almost free.


  • Ducks which force themselves on a female duck are more likely to be undesirable to begin with. The ability to filter out the weaker genes, and choose a “better” mate would lead to better offspring survival. Particularly if the female is already eaten limited by egg production rates.

    The opposite has occurred in a particular Beatle (who’s name I have forgotten). They have a perfectly functioning reproductive system. However, the male ignores it and stabs them through the side.

    It turns out, in related beatles, when a female is mortally wounded, they dump out eggs as fast as they can, before dying. This causes a selection pressure which wiped out normal reproduction.





  • Free would definitely be better, but requires solving other problems in lockstep. E.g. homeless people using the busses as a place to exist/stay warm. It disrupts the bus as a function.

    A small (deliberately) token fee gets the best compromise. It’s akin to charging 10p for a plastic bag. For most people 10p isn’t enough to be problematic, in the grand scheme of things. It does massively reduce frivolous usage.

    I would prefer pushing it down to £1 return, or even lower, but £2/trip is still better than the current option.

    Oh, and just to clarify I also definitely believe we should be using taxes to give homeless etc somewhere better to exist. The busses/trains/underground are not the place for that to happen.


  • The modern world has made it so that teenagers have nowhere to “exist” without paying. Even hanging out on the road gets the police called on them.

    Many have moved to online communities. At that point the line between social media and game are quite blurry. Is a Minecraft server a game, or a way of having fun with your friends?

    As someone who “found my tribe” online, long before I found them in real life, I understand where the woods are coming from. Even for adults, the modern world has become VERY socially isolating.

    It’s also not just bad households. A lot of families now have 2 working parents. This leaves very little time for arranging playdates, or giving lifts to friends. Kids supplement their lost social time with online time. Some end up in toxic communities, but most flow through it with years of experience at this point.

    I watched a talk on internet safety for children (as a parent/guardian). One of the biggest bits of advice was to stay involved. Play the games they love, even if they bore you. Let them talk about their online friendship groups. You can then help guide them towards good choices, rather than deal with the fallout from bad ones compounding.