AI video won’t need Hollywood. Putting IP into it was a dumb idea. Mickey Mouse seductively polishing a candle stick? That’s not what they wanted, but that’s what they’d get.
When AI comes for movies, it’s going to show how crappy (most) movies already are.
AI makes what people tell it to. Hollywood is already creatively bankrupt, derivative, and boring. AI is, funnily enough, the solution to the current situation - it’ll allow budding film makers who could never get a million dollar budget to make entire movies with blockbuster level cgi and production for essentially peanuts. It’ll allow “reshoots” and editing and complete rewrites in an afternoon instead of months and millions more dollars.
It is funnily enough almost the saviour to movies, while spelling the demise of the movie industry as we know it. It’s electricity to the candle. It’s the model T to the horse and cart.
You clumsily believe in AI like somewhere between a religion and a scam you are trying to get me in on when the reality is this is a tool for bullshitters and nobody really likes bullshit art.
Even if AI wasn’t primarily bullshit, which it is, your conception that AI making movie production “cheaper” and more disposable in nature will SAVE Hollywood from making uninspiring movies is laughably absurd.
What the hell are you smoking? That makes no sense, movies are going to become massively more derivative, that is how capitalism works, it is a race to the bottom.
If AI makes what you tell it to, as you say, than AI will make crushingly derivative and boring movies for massive companies that have extinguished all the other studios making movies that aren’t AI slop.
You don’t understand AI beyond your scifi slop fantasy of what it is rather then the reality that it is possibly one of the worst lossy data compression algorithms ever designed.
Without a constant influx of high quality human training data curated by humans AI is capable of nothing novel. It is a highly lossy data compression algorithm that is somehow so processing inefficient it has become an existential environmental problem because of the electricity use required to sustain this bullshit.
Yeah, you’ve got no idea what AI is if you think the compression is out of the user’s control.
You should look at the PROFESSIONAL AI tools for video creation that involve an entire render process for the 3d scenes it makes, that import into apps like Blender, Maya, etc. Auto-rigging and motion generation basically allows anyone to make an entire movie.
You’ve shown you know nothing about AI beyond OpenAI’s consumer offerings.
You can hate AI all you want, but you sound uneducated af.
You are deflecting from my points by appealing to a list of specific references to tooling when that doesn’t address my actual point.
These are all lossy data compression algorithms trained on sets of human curated data created by humans. Sure you can make some use of them, but they are massively inefficient from almost every angle versus humans creating tutorials, humans creating project templates and easy to understand user interfaces, humans making teaching materials for other humans, humans answering questions on forums, humans just doing HUMAN things…
ANYTHING you argue as a pro for AI is just a poorly extracted benefit from a curated set of human data that could have been better leveraged by humans helping humans create new things directly.
You can hate AI all you want, but you sound uneducated af.
You have no idea what you’re talking about. The data YOU are missing is vast. The reason for this is you have no idea what it’s capable of beyond your current understanding.
You’re refusing to educate yourself to hold onto an idea… that’s cult behavior.
It’s fine to hate AI, but do it with education and you won’t come off like some Christian cultist
AI video won’t need Hollywood. Putting IP into it was a dumb idea. Mickey Mouse seductively polishing a candle stick? That’s not what they wanted, but that’s what they’d get.
When AI comes for movies, it’s going to show how crappy (most) movies already are.
I am not afraid of AI taking over movies, everything AI makes is suffocatingly derivative and boring.
AI makes what people tell it to. Hollywood is already creatively bankrupt, derivative, and boring. AI is, funnily enough, the solution to the current situation - it’ll allow budding film makers who could never get a million dollar budget to make entire movies with blockbuster level cgi and production for essentially peanuts. It’ll allow “reshoots” and editing and complete rewrites in an afternoon instead of months and millions more dollars.
It is funnily enough almost the saviour to movies, while spelling the demise of the movie industry as we know it. It’s electricity to the candle. It’s the model T to the horse and cart.
You clumsily believe in AI like somewhere between a religion and a scam you are trying to get me in on when the reality is this is a tool for bullshitters and nobody really likes bullshit art.
Even if AI wasn’t primarily bullshit, which it is, your conception that AI making movie production “cheaper” and more disposable in nature will SAVE Hollywood from making uninspiring movies is laughably absurd.
What the hell are you smoking? That makes no sense, movies are going to become massively more derivative, that is how capitalism works, it is a race to the bottom.
If AI makes what you tell it to, as you say, than AI will make crushingly derivative and boring movies for massive companies that have extinguished all the other studios making movies that aren’t AI slop.
Umm… just like Hollywood.
No, the difference is it is actually possible though unlikely for an original movie to come out of a big studio.
AI because of the fundamental design of it, will never ever make anything original.
Sure it will. Give it a prompt and it does the work. Make the prompt original and it will be original. AI doesn’t choose the story… humans do.
I just don’t think you understand AI beyond chatbots and low effort memes.
You don’t understand AI beyond your scifi slop fantasy of what it is rather then the reality that it is possibly one of the worst lossy data compression algorithms ever designed.
Without a constant influx of high quality human training data curated by humans AI is capable of nothing novel. It is a highly lossy data compression algorithm that is somehow so processing inefficient it has become an existential environmental problem because of the electricity use required to sustain this bullshit.
Yeah, you’ve got no idea what AI is if you think the compression is out of the user’s control.
You should look at the PROFESSIONAL AI tools for video creation that involve an entire render process for the 3d scenes it makes, that import into apps like Blender, Maya, etc. Auto-rigging and motion generation basically allows anyone to make an entire movie.
You’ve shown you know nothing about AI beyond OpenAI’s consumer offerings.
You can hate AI all you want, but you sound uneducated af.
You are deflecting from my points by appealing to a list of specific references to tooling when that doesn’t address my actual point.
These are all lossy data compression algorithms trained on sets of human curated data created by humans. Sure you can make some use of them, but they are massively inefficient from almost every angle versus humans creating tutorials, humans creating project templates and easy to understand user interfaces, humans making teaching materials for other humans, humans answering questions on forums, humans just doing HUMAN things…
ANYTHING you argue as a pro for AI is just a poorly extracted benefit from a curated set of human data that could have been better leveraged by humans helping humans create new things directly.
You sound like you are in a cult.
You have no idea what you’re talking about. The data YOU are missing is vast. The reason for this is you have no idea what it’s capable of beyond your current understanding.
You’re refusing to educate yourself to hold onto an idea… that’s cult behavior.
It’s fine to hate AI, but do it with education and you won’t come off like some Christian cultist