Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-22 months agoIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?message-squaremessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up165arrow-down13
arrow-up162arrow-down1message-squareIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-22 months agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-squareFreedomAdvocatelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 months agoThey already have - having Nukes.
minus-squarekent_eh@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month ago They already have - having Nukes. That only defends against a sane leadership with a military chain of command that isn’t compromised.
minus-squareFreedomAdvocatelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoSeems to have gone pretty well for the last 80 years or so. Don’t see any reason why that would change.
minus-squareClinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·2 months agosigh Nm
minus-squareblarghly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoAlso, if you meant that a country created some sort of perfect defence against nukes, then every other country would immediately start pouring money into creating their own version, while working on ways of subverting the new technology.
They already have - having Nukes.
That only defends against a sane leadership with a military chain of command that isn’t compromised.
Seems to have gone pretty well for the last 80 years or so. Don’t see any reason why that would change.
sigh
Nm
Also, if you meant that a country created some sort of perfect defence against nukes, then every other country would immediately start pouring money into creating their own version, while working on ways of subverting the new technology.