Either by sending a code to SMS or Email, you are able to sign into your account without ever needing to or being able to add a password. Why has this become a thing recently?

  • FreedomAdvocate
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Because passwordless authentication is awesome and needs to be the standard. It’s basically just skipping the password and going straight to 2FA, which is the main security behind any account that you’ve got 2FA on.

    • lovely_reader@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you skip the password then you’re back down to just 1FA, it just happens to be the factor that used to be second.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Technically the truth, but an argument can be made that 2FA was mostly more secure by virtue of how bad password security is, and selling a switch to passkey as a convenience is a big security win.

        Also with passkey, you’ll be commonly be forced to do some sort of device unlock making it generally the “thing you have” require either “thing you are” or “thing you know” so it becomes effectively 2fa.

        • lovely_reader@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yeah, password on its own is weak. Any factor + password will always be a lot more secure than password alone OR the other factor alone, but pairing stronger factors of course results in stronger pairings.

          Passkey is a device check (the key lives on your device and nowhere else), so it relies on your device security, even if it’s just a PIN…and there has to be a backup option in case you lose access to that device, in which case the account only ends up as secure as that authentication method…which hopefully isn’t password alone.

      • FreedomAdvocate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeh but with 2FA the password is essentially irrelevant because no one other than you can get in even if they have your password, so why not just skip it?

        What downsides are there to passwordless authentication in your mind?

        • lovely_reader@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m not defending passwords specifically. You could do better 2FA with email + biometrics, although of course device authentication is only as secure as the device itself—but that’s entirely beside the point, which is that there must be two factors if you’re going to call something two factor authentication.

          • FreedomAdvocate
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            Passwordless isn’t 2FA……it’s passwordless. I’m not calling it 2FA.

            • lovely_reader@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              I see that the comment I initially replied to has been edited, but it still reads as though the second factor of 2FA is itself 2FA:

              Because passwordless authentication is awesome and needs to be the standard. It’s basically just skipping the password and going straight to 2FA, which is the main security behind any account that you’ve got 2FA on.

              2FA stands for two-factor authentication. The typical case you’re describing:

              Factor 1: password Factor 2: device check, usually

              That second step of device verification itself isn’t 2FA, it’s only the second factor of that particular 2FA, and the reason your account is more secure behind it isn’t because it’s a device check but because it’s a second factor. There’s not really a “main” security check in 2FA because having two is the whole point.

              I do have thoughts about passwordless as a standalone security measure, but that’s not at all what I’m addressing here. I will add, however, that since passwordless can only ever be as strong as the security on your email account…it might seem like enough if your email is protected by 2FA—but not if you mistakenly leave your email logged in on a device someone else has access to, which may sound stupid but it definitely happens.

        • fox2263@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Because the password still needs to be correct. What if the thief has your phone but no password

          • FreedomAdvocate
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            If a thief already has your phone unlocked then nothing else matters, you’re fucked and all your accounts are compromised.

            • fox2263@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              There’s lots of factors for everything isn’t there. If a thief has your phone unlocked then yes you’re pretty much knackered

            • fox2263@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              But they don’t have access to your email in this instance.

              If the thief has your email and password and phone then you’re SOL

              • FreedomAdvocate
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                If they’ve got your phone with your 2FA they’ve also got your email on your phone lol

              • NewDark@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                If they don’t have email access, why is a passwordless magic link sent to an email bad then?

                • FreedomAdvocate
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  The tech “enthusiasts” of Lemmy are really showing their arses in here lol. They have a “I took 2 semesters of computer science so I’m somewhat of an expert” level of understanding and mentality.

                  There’s a reason most big tech companies are starting to move to passwordless logins. If 2FA is the ultimate protection about unauthorised access, the password is ultimately irrelevant - and given all we know about password reuse and data breaches, getting rid of them is a good thing.