• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Did you read the part where this is a radar satellite designed for monitoring the climate? That is, did you read anything besides the headline before you decided: “Yeah, I think I’m able to make informed commentary about this”?

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I don’t know why you’re assuming their ‘/s’ is alluding to sarcasm around this being surveillance versus sarcasm around needing more surveillance. “We need more surveillance (we actually don’t)” seems to be indicated here, not “This is surveillance (it actually isn’t)”.

          Especially when Reddit types are notoriously, chronically unable to read articles before they go spouting uninformed bullshit in the comments.

          • snooggums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Why not both?

            (We don’t need more surveillance and this isn’t actually surveillance.)

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        24 hours ago

        A lot of technology has been repurposed for other uses than what they were mutually designed. What’s to stop the operators from using such a high def satellite to spy on people?

        • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Probably because it’s too cheap and primitive? Why use something not specially used to spy on people when you already have significantly designed satellites with a bigger budget and better technology?