• Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    So, basically it eliminates heating needs over summer, which is amazingly useful. But it doesn’t do much for winter.

    That sounds crappy, but it’s probably a good 10-20% reduction in heating emissions, which is nothing to sneer at.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It does do something important in the winter: smooth out the irregularities on renewables. It’s not like you charge it up in September and then just expect it to carry you through to March. It means that your renewables just have to cover the demand some time this week, not at the exact moment the town wants the power. If there’s a high-pressure front that means you’ve got minimal wind for Monday through to Thursday, it’s fine, you just extract power from the battery and then re-heat when the wind picks up at the weekend

      • ramble81@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        That does sound interesting. I’m curious though what the heat loss is while stored (I.e how much energy is lost over time with no energy being pulled)

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          18 hours ago

          They’ve got a quote from an Oxford uni professor of energy and climate policy in there who says it can store heat effectively for weeks. The manufacturer claims that it maintains about 80% of its “charge” if left for a month

          One of the cool things about this design is that the bigger it is, the better it gets at storing heat. The square-cube law is in effect here, since heat can only be lost by leaving the silo at the outside whereas heat can be stored throughout the whole volume