The Seattle Police Department is searching for two men who climbed over the glass wall of the city’s iconic Space Needle on Friday, flipped over the edge and parachuted down from the 605-foot structure.

The jumpers face trespassing charges, according to a report provided by Public Affairs Officer Brian Pritchard.

The BASE jumpers purchased tickets and entered the Space Needle at about 8:50 p.m. Friday, according to the Seattle Police Department. The popular attraction has a round observation deck surrounded by high glass windows that are open to the sky above.

They were seen on camera at the top level of the Needle then went into a restroom, coming out with helmets on, according to police.

They ran to the glass window, climbed over to the other side, and jumped off, according to police.

  • ReverendIrreverence@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 days ago

    Another unbalanced and inordinate waste of taxpayer dollars. Spending 10’s of thousands of dollars to try and write 2 trespassing tickets is fucking stupid. They did it. They got away. They didn’t hurt themselves or anyone else. Now go have some donuts and shut the fuck up piggies.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Not a lawyer, but I’m guessing the trespassing applies when they opted to enter restricted areas of the facility, or maybe the air around it.

      • Courtney (she/her/they) @lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        “I had no way of knowing I wasn’t permitted to climb over the glass, there was no sign and nobody told us not to” is a perfectly valid defence, IMO. Whether it “should be common sense” or not is irrelevant.

        You can’t claim someone has trespassed when all they did was just choose an alternate route back to ground level, much less an alternate route that did not say “don’t take this route”.

        • doughless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Courts frequently use the standard of whether a “reasonable person would have known” something. They might try to play dumb, but it almost definitely wouldn’t work as a defense. Trespassing laws don’t require signage, a clear structural barrier is enough.

          • SillyDude@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 days ago

            This is state by state. Where I live singage is explicitly required. Every 50ft.

            Private property can trespass anyone at anytime for any reason though. That applies everywhere. Trying to get them for criminal trespass is a waste of time. What the police would like to know is exactly who they are and to trespass them from there, in just to get their records going.

            • doughless@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Yes, laws do vary by state, but those signage laws typically apply to open land, not internal buildings/structures. A store doesn’t need signage to prevent you from hopping over the counter to where the register is.

          • Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            As a reasonable person I think it was an awesome idea, and in fact think they should open this up to everyone that can base jump say every month or so.

        • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          I agree. Best they can do is say “don’t so it again, you’re not allowed here anymore”. No signage or prior warnings means no charges.

        • ccunning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          My understanding is, you aren’t “trespassing” in publicly accessible areas, until you’ve been told to leave and refused*

          *Of course it varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but generally in the U.S.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      On that we agree.

      I understand in concept why it’s important to go after base jumpers, but there’s almost certainly bigger fish to fry. Police are fucking lazy.

      • loutr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        They say they’re searching but I bet they’re not doing shit. Nobody got hurt and, as you say, they’re fucking lazy.

      • lol_idk@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well I think doing nothing is better than most of what they do. Just doing nothing night not hurt anyone

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    They won’t let it go because it was a public display. It’s not about safety, it’s about exerting control.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      In part, yes.

      Still, I can understand why it’s necessary to dissuade others from trying. These sorts of stunts can fail and cause problems for other people, after all. (Particularly in an urban environment.)

      But if someone wants to jump off the side of a mountain and maybe get only themselves killed, I’m all for it. Have fun out there.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        But if someone wants to jump off the side of a mountain and maybe get only themselves killed, I’m all for it. Have fun out there.

        I find your lack of concern for the life of Sasquatch deeply offensive. 🤣

        OTOH, us scientifically proving Bigfoot is real because a BASE jumper leapt off a mountain, had their parachute fail, and just happened to land on a Sasquatch, killing them both? That would be one Hell of a timeline. Though really, wouldn’t such an absurd thing be just perfect? Certainly better than someone just finding a dead one randomly one day.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I mean, yes - fuck SPD - but at the same time this is wildly reckless and should absolutely be punished. The area under the space needle is an extremely high traffic area; if this had gone wrong they could have so easily killed people.

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah but it’s over. So what’s the point.

        Really the only thing to do is figure out how to stop the next person from doing it.

          • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s not a legal defense. I don’t know why you would think it would be.

            What would you have them do? Sit in jail awhile or something? Not very helpful in the long run.

            The issue is public safety. So you have to consider what to do that detours the next one. Wasting time trying to track them down isn’t going to do that.

  • lyrial@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Aren’t parachutes a pretty conspicuous piece of equipment? I would have thought that staff would know to look for them. I might be ignorant here though.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      The ones I’ve worn look like this:

      That’s not a skydiving chute, it’s an emergency escape chute, worn by aerobatic and test pilots in case they need to walk back to the airport. I’ll never forget the first time I wore one, it was during spin lessons during instructor training. In shockingly few words this guy explained to me how to fly and land the tightly folded aircraft strapped to my back. The large silver handle here on this shoulder strap, pull it all the way out to deploy, look up, grab the loops, pull them down to your ears, pull left to go left pull right to go right, as you come in to land pull all the way down. I asked “Okay, how do you deploy the reserve chute?” He said “That IS the reserve chute. Plan A is landing the plane.”

      You wouldn’t mistake it for a school backpack. It’s not something you could easily hide under clothing without looking really strange.

      • lyrial@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, that’s what is weird about it. They were not stopped immediately on entry, which is confusing to me. Someone really failed to do their job here.

    • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s not that much security there so even if staff noticed depending on how things went there wouldn’t have been much time to seriously react to the “threat” but also, who cares? They didn’t hurt anyone