• TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8分前

    This is me when they finally take down piracy and I just can’t get the media anymore, since I refuse to give them a cent. I know I’ll adapt, and probably be better off for it.

  • vithigar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5時間前

    I cancelled my Netflix several years ago literally the very first time I got an error that too many people were watching or a screen wasn’t authorized or whatever the specific “you can’t share your account anymore” error was at the time.

    The fact that account sharing was tacitly allowed was literally the only thing keeping the value proposition of having the account afloat.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3時間前

      Same here. I barely used Netflix and was only paying the bill because I shared the password with family members and didn’t want to cut them off.

      Once they started being weird about account sharing, there was no reason to keep paying the bill. I was on the top tier too, because they said you could play on 4 screens at once, and I figured it was fair to pay extra since I was sharing the account.

      Nobody in my family complained so it’s likely they weren’t really using it either. So instead of a top-tier account being shared among a bunch of people that didn’t really use it, they get nothing.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5時間前

      The fact Netflix used to actually use sharing accounts as PROMOTIONAL MATERIAL is wild to me. They leaned healily into it.

  • chefdano3@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3時間前

    And people always are confused when I tell them I don’t watch shows and movies anymore.

    • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1時間前

      You can still do that without streaming services? Like you don’t need to stop enjoying art cuz of capitalism

  • sudo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    13時間前

    To be fair, too many people are using your account. 0 people should be on it.

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13分前

      That would be the ideal for Netflix. Everyone subscribes and pays, but no one uses it.

      Gee, maybe that’s why it’s so hard to find anything good to watch on Netflix now.

    • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8時間前

      I pay for Netflix and share with my sister in laws family and they pay for Hulu and Disney plus. Good trade off imo

      • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5時間前

        None of that is a good trade off when you’re giving money to those shit companies.

        • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4時間前

          I pretty much have every major streaming service and cable. I’m a sucker for tv content

          • k_rol@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4時間前

            It’s ok if you want to pay and share with others. Some people here are just a bit too extreme.

            I pay only for Canadian services, the rest is from the sea, it’s MY way to do it.

        • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3時間前

          What’s the point of debrid of you have torrentio? It seems to have basically everything.

          I’ve never fully saw the value of debred, maybe I’m missing something.

          • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2時間前

            The point is the almost guaranteed speed. With a debrid service I can stream and watch a 4K BluRay remux immediately with Stremio + Torrentio, no waiting, no buffering, no hitches. Sure a new or popular movie will work well without debrid but a lot of times older movies don’t stream well without a debrid especially high bit rate files.

          • sam@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2時間前

            Instead of torrenting on my ISP network or paying for a VPN, I pay for a debrid and they give me a high quality fast link to download without torrenting.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19時間前

    Just one reason their stock price is down. They no longer report subscriber numbers — you can probably guess why. It’s strange to me that a public company can just hide data from investors that might reveal when a company isn’t doing so hot.

    It’s also stupid they would clamp down like this on ad-supported plans. Advertisers want eyeballs, and this means less of them. Reminds me of Reddit moving to a log-in only model.

    https://www.fool.com/investing/2026/07/15/with-netflix-down-45-from-its-highs-viewer-engagem/

    https://www.businessinsider.com/netflix-engagement-data-earnings-subscribers-stock-wall-street-2026-7

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4時間前

      Stranger Things finally ended and the price for no ads went over $20 per month. That’s what made me finally quit.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      12時間前

      the biggest reason is, them cancelling too many shows too soon. after 1-2 season, the show ceases to ecist. 3 if you are lucky and its thier way of forcing its end.

      • ILikeTraaaains@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4時間前

        One of the reasons I stopped watching Netflix shows was because all the ones I got invested those were cancelled just after one season.

    • Switorik@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19時間前

      I will never understand investors. Anyone with half a brain can put two and two together when a company starts hiding anything. Investors have no idea what they’re doing, they just trust the customer will make them money, get angry when they’ve been duped, and will do it again.

      • huppakee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        19時間前

        Not all investors are in it for the long run. Some just expect a short boost or go short betting on a loss.

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18時間前

        In this case, the ads are probably bringing in less per viewer than the service costs, so having non-paying viewers is still a net negative.

        Clamping down on this is probably a worse negative in the long run, but investors only care about this quarter.

        • reddig33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          17時間前

          Considering how many streamers are encouraging people to sign up for the ad-supported plans, I think they’re making more money from the ads. Of course, they’re double-dipping just like the cable companies used to do. Charging for a subscription, and then making even more money by showing you ads. The OP’s screenshot is like how they used to charge for each cable descrambler box in a home. Wanna watch in both the bedroom and the living room? Pay up!

          It’s just greed.

    • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13時間前

      They aren’t stopping reporting subscriber numbers, what are you talking about? They’re dropping from reporting it twice a year to just once a year. Annual growth is really all that matters after all. What matters far more is revenue, profit, and cash flow - all of which are still reported regularly.

      Stock prices falling after earnings calls is basically the norm because no matter how well they go, even beating expectations, some people wanted more - and you can’t ignore the market manipulation by big players who try to manufacture drops so they can increase their position. Spook people to sell and drop the price so they can buy more at a reduced price.

      Netflix need or exceeded their targets as they have basically every single time for years. Their revenue grew double digits, their margins are getting healthier, and their viewing hours increased.

    • Hazzard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14時間前

      Advertisers want eyeballs, and this means less of them. Reminds me of Reddit moving to a log-in only model.

      Not sure if you’re being rhetorical, but I’ll answer anyways. The reason Reddit wants you to log in is to better track you, no duh. The reason that makes them more money is because better data means better ad targeting, and better ad targeting can be translated to results like a better click through rate. When a platform has that, they can incentivize more advertisers to spend more money on their platform.

      That way, each time they sell an ad, that ad can be more expensive. It’s undeniable that demanding logins will be bad for the number of ads they sell, but if they can sell higher quality ads, they’ll make more money at the end of the day.

      This whole thing is the core driver behind privacy being eroded at scale, because ad targeting has proven effective, and so advertisers want to advertise on the platform with the best targeting. So everyone wants to spy on their users the best and build the best targeting.

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    15時間前

    Fuck em. Lots of free media out there. My local library has all sorts of stuff, and that’s not even considering what’s out on the high seas.

  • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15時間前

    Plex. Jellyfin is fine too, I am just used to Plex and prefer it’s interface. I don’t mind paying a few dollars per month for it.

    • neo2478@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11時間前

      This is coming from a person with a Plex lifetime pass for the last 15 years. Fuck Plex and their greed.

      I was on the same boat as you, but this year I switched to Jellyfin and could not be happier. It actually feels smoother for me than Plex. Also there are a pot of little quality of life improvements which did not work on Plex for me, like always auto loadng subtitles in my language of choice.

      • dai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8時間前

        Plex is good for those in our circles who only know of VPNs from ads on YouTube.

        Jellyfin is great and all but not something you can just expose to the internet and hope for the best.

      • Billegh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11時間前

        Plex will also auto select subtitles for your language of you set it up, and jellyfin currently can desync subtitles if you skip forward enough.

        I don’t really have a preference between the two, but jellyfin still feels rough around the edges in places.