Preorders in 2027. No photos or real feature reveals.

  • plateee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Yeah, I’m staying the fuck away from Ford or at least the next 5 years. They outsourced all of their design shit to AI and then had to higher engineers back.

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    State of Charge channel on YouTube did some research (and speculation) and believes the battery will be a 51 kWh LFP.

    That would mean the likely range on a mid-sized pickup (depending on the aero, wheel size, tires, etc.) is about 200 miles or less.

    It is also confirmed to be 400V architecture. So its likely to be fairly slow charging (compared to the best possible charge speeds in recent EVs).

    Informed speculation for those who are interested.

  • KnitWit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’d be nice of someone told them you don’t need that big pedestrian smasher grill on an ev.

  • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The MSRP listed is almost the same price a new Maverick starts at. Now let’s see if they actually produce enough to meet demand to keep it at that MSRP, or if this will be just like when the Maverick launched and the dealers tack on another 15-20k due to scarcity.

    I’d consider this for a trade in of my hybrid Maverick, but we will see when it’s fully revealed.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      At some point you need to stop letting perfect be the enemy of the good. Bezos is a Slate investor, but that hardly makes a slate something that’s made by Bezos. It doesn’t seem connected to the Amazon ecosystem in any way.

      It’s really easy to purity test oneself into complete irrelevance.

      • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Anything that doesn’t have mandatory telemetry gets my approval. It’s a very low bar to clear but there really aren’t any others trying to do it.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Human beings are capable of reading text beyond its surface-level dictionary meaning. Are you a human being?

    • cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Check out telo - i really like them (wish it were more affordable, but still, if i were to buy a new vehicle, itd be that one once available and vetted)

      • cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Telo and Canoo really went back to the drawing board and designed trucks around the skateboard design of an EV. No frunk, front seat as far forward as possible, relatively aerodynamic design. Carbros absolutely hated them and derided them to no end but the only real objection was that they looked so much different from the designs they are accustomed to to, that is, designs tailored to the specific problem of accommodating a large engine block. At some point we’re going to have to leave these designs in the past, it’s just a matter of time.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Meanwhile, the past:


          Edit: the more I think about it, bringing back the Econoline brand specifically as an electric “cabover” pickup and/or van would be extremely cool.

          (It wouldn’t really be a cabover because the thing the cab is over is the engine and an EV doesn’t have that, but you know what I mean.)

        • BurgerBaron@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Hadn’t heard of those before. I like the Canoo design immediately, Telo less so but if they ever made a 2 door with a longer bed I’d probably be into it.

          JfWveTJIq4kjIgn.jpg

          IcuwD1cLDehaxNK.jpg

  • bw42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Oh look, Ford is making another shit UV with a pretend bed, so innovative.

    Will start at $30k with the mandatory fees, before the dealers “value add” it another $15k.

    My 2006 Ranger is the last Ford I will ever own.

  • stopforgettingit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Great another monster sized truck that needs to do a 3 point turn to get on to my street because they can’t corner worth a shit. Even Maverick - which might be the smallest pick up I can get in the US right now is the size of a large to mid sized pick up.

    Man I’d love to have an EV truck that is the size of one of the old Toyota pick-ups from the 90s. Make me a truck that I can see over the roof of and I am sold.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This is nothing close to a “monster size truck”, it’s actually quite small. Its smaller than a Maverick even. And while you can argue its not quite as small as the compact pickups of yore, there’s absolutely no universe where it’s “monster sized”.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      A Maverick is almost exactly the same size as a mid-'90s Ranger, which is a compact pickup. The only difference is that it’s got more cab and less bed.

      (Source: I parked my Ranger next to a Maverick once.)

      • stopforgettingit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I remember driving my dad’s mid 90’s extended cab ranger and it felt huge. I have a core memory of trying to do a U-turn on a mildly busy street in it and how stressful that was for teenage me.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          I should clarify: a Maverick is roughly the same length as my regular-cab, short-bed Ranger.

    • bw42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I put money down on a Slate. It was the closest to what I wanted; a simple, no bs, light duty truck that’s electric.

      Their site puts it at just a little bigger than 1980’s Toyota pick-up.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If it’s electric, why is the hood tall? There should be no need and it is a danger to pedestrian and cyclists.

  • bluGill@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    How doesn’t it tow, and what is the cargo capacity? To me trucks are about work. I hate 4 door trucks because to get cargo space compromises either length or need space. I had one before and it was not fun to drive but I used that full length bed. I have need to haul a big trailer as well. If it is the family I’ll drive a car. (Spreading of cars, I want a tiny car as they are so much more fun to drive)

    • magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Gotta keep that grille big and manly, especially to make up for the fact that it’s electric! The lives of a few children are inconsequential compared to that.