• RamRabbit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      RWE said that it will now reinvest the sum into conventional gas projects, including $900m (£669m) in a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal project in Louisiana.

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yes, which is not what you said before. RWE is getting paid for nothing to then invest its own money in other projects. The difference is ownership. The difference matters.

        • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          From what I can tell, RWE would have owned the wind projects before as well.

          RWE said it has agreed to relinquish its leases off the California and Louisiana coasts as well as in the New York Bight.

          They wouldn’t need to relinquish leases if the US was the owner and RWE was simply a contractor building stuff for them.

          • ywain@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            That’s 1.2 billion - 900 million, and still a profit making venture. Paid by the US government to still make money. US capitalism.

          • Jiral@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Your interpretation doesn’t sound like the only possible one. Do you have a source that is clearly stating these things?