Which text editor do you use?

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I don’t understand the issue. I’ve been using Linux less than a year but I started with a KDE desktop so it came with Kate, Kwrite, and Nano. I’ve literally never needed anything else.

    I’ve tried out a couple IDEs like Codium and Geany, but I don’t see what they offer that Kate doesn’t.

    I’ve also at least opened Emacs but I didn’t get much further than that.

    I use Nano in the terminal when I’m editing config files because I read somewhere that it’s safer.

    I installed Neovim and Micro but I haven’t explored those at all yet. I don’t have any problems with Nano.

    I tried Pluma but I really only use it for dumping lists.

    For the most part I use Kate, but for simpler notes I use Kwrite just to keep them in separate spots on my launcher.

    I don’t see why this is such an issue though.

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Nothing wrong with Kate. I know how to use Nano because it’s an essential skill for when your machine boots into emergency mode, but aside from that editing text from the terminal is lunacy.

  • 18107@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I liked Sublime enough to pay for it. It has become my primary text editor at home.

    I also like Atom/Pulsar, but it takes a but too long to open for my use case.

    Obsidian isn’t exactly a text editor, but it fits many of the use cases. It may be closed source, but all the files are accessible and usable if the app ever disappears.

    I want to use vim more, but I’m lazy, and the learning curve keeps putting me off. I might get there eventually.

    Nano is ol’ reliable. When everything else failed, Nano was still there for me and worked perfectly.

    • MasterNerd@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I learned vim (technically vi) because it was the only editor available on these tiny liveusbs I would use for work. It was literally my only option. Once I got used to the motions, using any text editor without vim motions felt unusable to me.

    • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      This is my reply every time someone suggests nvim. Is it on the servers I use but I’m not an admin for? No? Then it doesn’t sound like a great option.

    • barzaria@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This command will literally overwrite the file that you do whenever you try to edit it. You need two >> to append at the end of a file, but it’s super-duper hard to put text in the middle of a file from the terminal. That is why people use editors, for sure. Now that I think about it, there probably is some psychopath who uses the actual command line as an editor. They’re probably more elitist than Vim users lol.

  • certified_expert@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Poor souls of those that haven’t found the way of the Gnu.

    May the Gnu have mercy of your lost ways and show you the light M-x show-light RET

    May the macros never lack in your life,
    May your parentheses be balanced,
    And may your init.el pass with no fails.

    Emen

  • rozodru@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I constantly switch between Nixvim, DOOM Emacs, helix, and NVChad. I can never settle on one editor for long. I don’t know why.