• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m a Republican, and in nine months of advocating for safer streets, I have yet to meet another one.

    You’re a hbthe wrong crowd…

    Yet somewhere along the way, we turned roads into a political argument

    Yeah. You know who is “we” here? Republicans

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Nah this ain’t it. All shared resources, including transportation, are inherently political.

  • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Welllllll, bike lanes ARE DEI! They’re inclusive of people who don’t have cars.

    I don’t think you could explain the ideas behind DEI to a conservative though.

  • treesquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “I thought something obviously stupid because nothing is real unless it affects me. But then it affected me! ¡Que sorpresa!”

  • S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 hours ago

    But when Republicans talk about freedom, the progressives hear privilege. Aren’t the Left and the Right essentially saying the same thing?

    No. The fuck is wrong with you?

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m sorry for the loss, the road did indeed fail, and I am happy there’s at least one Republican who cares about road safety, but …….

    There’s a whole lot of twisted logic trying to make it seem like “both sides the same”. I mean, I wouldn’t argue it since she does see the light after it affected her personally, but wtf

  • brianary@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Why is it always the left that has to dumb things down for the right?

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      So that is easy. Religion is based on tradition, and the right is heavy based on religion. Tradition is all about doing a thing without really knowing why. So it skews heavily toward the non-critical thinkers.

    • Alexfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Most have ability to learn more, but the systems indoctrinate them not to learn more than they allow and be obedient, they go along to fit in, their team wins when others lose, zero sum thinking. It’s damaging and holds us all back.

  • orenj [he/they]@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I hate people so much. Oh, whats that? The big authority man told you thing was bad? You’re just gonna accept it at face value and let him do whatever he wants? Oh nooo, your fucking beloved family member is dead now, and nothing less would have convinced you. Guess authority man was wrong about this one little thing

  • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Republicans and Democrats are often arguing for the same thing using completely different languages.

    That’s where I stopped reading.

    • bampop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      And yet…

      I thought bike lanes were a DEI project

      I’m a Republican, and in nine months of advocating for safer streets, I have yet to meet another one.

      The cognitive dissonance is strong with this one

      Trying to make these threads meet, I guess the point she’s trying to make is that after the leopards ate her face, she came to understand that the reason Republicans oppose everything that benefits the public is not because they are stupid and/or evil, but because Democrats are failing to communicate in a way that appeals to them.

  • 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    The Left loses the Right as soon as bike lanes are tied into identity politics. Multimodal equity is simply “freedom of movement” to a Republican.

    Bruh. Are you fucking kidding me? Everyone who has been arguing for bike lanes and public transit has been calling it something along the lines of freedom of movement for years. We’ve been mocking how “muh freedum” people also see a veritable tank as the only reasonable means of getting from place to place, and oppose everything else. You DO NOT need knobby tires and 4WD and a 6 inch lift to go to Sam’s Club. You’ll be perfectly fine doing it in a stock Toyota Corolla.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      It’s always projection. In reality, the right-wingers are the ones trying to tie bike lanes to “identity politics.”

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Right-wingers are unable to distinguish between the content and the frame, so they assume that however conservative media packaged a leftist argument for them is just how it came from the source.

  • Malica@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It wouldn’t be so bad if they didn’t demand respect while doing everything they can to avoid earning it.