• Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s the problem, people think of Trump as the cause

    He’s the result.

    When your government is for sale, the elected are greedy, ruthless, amoral villains.

    Trump is stupid, we’ll miss him when someone brilliantly evil “wins”.

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yep. It’s like if it doesn’t affect western countries, the genocides aren’t really brought up.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    That’s not true. You know of Mussolini, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing oh I see what you mean yes this is bad

  • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Except for Obama. A lot of people outside the US knew Obama, and loved/love him.

    Trump everyone knows, and hates.

    So both sides of the coin here.

  • mrmisses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you say “I can’t wait for him to die” and the whole world thinks of the same person, it’s probably pretty damn bad

      • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        Abraham Lincoln for their positive contribution

        Whole world knows his name

        No? He was a leader during USA civil war, nothing noteworthy on the world scale. He was for freeing some slaves, but famously not his.

        Roosevelt, yes, that guy is more known for their contribution.

    • papalonian@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 days ago

      I had a longer title in mind that said there was a small chance of it being a great thing, but a much higher chance of it being a really, really bad thing

      • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think you could save this one still. People knew his name before he was elected leader because he was imprisoned by his racist government. That’s not really a good thing.

        Aung San Suu Kyi, for a short time while in power before she tolerated genocide on her watch, would have sort of fit in the Mandela category as well.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Ok, Ho Chi Minh, and the one thing that the guy who oversaw crimes against humanity and slavery against Uncle Ho’s people was known for was good. The other things Charles De Gaul did, not so much.

  • taygaloocat@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Jacinda Ardern and Barack Obama both had a pretty good rep and worldwide appeal. Maybe even Xi Jinping

    Idk if your statement is correct

    • morto@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      The only leader I know that openly confronted consumerism and considered it a priority, as well as the concept of infinite economic growth. He even criticized latin american left parties for having turned poor people into consumers, and not into citizens (as in people with rights)

      • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        My favorite thing was how he never had security cuz was an authentic national treasure.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Part of a Marxist-Leninist urban guerrilla group fighting a democratically elected center-right government. Mujica was variously the sole survivor of a mission to take a telephone exchange, shot six times fighting multiple policemen (he injured two), part of four prison escapes, and lost his mind after years of solitary confinement.

    • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      He admired and supported Chavez, who was the one who started the destruction of my country, left Maduro here and dismantled all the industry and national trade, and the state’s companies put them in charge of inept people just because they were loyal to him.

      I wouldn’t say he was good if he supported such a character.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        dismantled all the industry and national trade

        Pretty sure US sanctions did that.

        As far as loyalty is concerned, I think having your president kidnapped and his replacement give us the rights to your oil for 100 years while our deranged leader tells the UN general assembly its ours by right of conquest kinda shows the importance of making sure everyone at high levels is loyal.

        • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          The US sanctions where another factor, yes, but not the biggest one. The biggest one was his bad administration. He did the same errors than his predecessors, even when he said that he was going to repair those errors, and he did these errors multiplied by ten.

          Even worst, he instaurated an institutionalized corruption mechanism, with a lot of nepotism, despotism, resources and money diversion and tunneling, etc.

          Also, take into account that some of the worst effects of his government preceded the US sanctions on Venezuela, that only made everything worst because he simply stealed harder from the citizens to be able to survive.

          Also he horribly managed our economy, depending excessively on oil and when the 2008 crisis started he didn’t had a second plan and even worse, had a lot of unnecessary expenses.

          Edit: A typo, I hate these 😮‍💨

  • Mr Fish@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    A lot of the world heard about Jacinda back during lockdowns, and that was for a good reason

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Our leader in the U.S. is a perfect reflection of our conservatives. If you know his qualities, you know the qualities of our conservatives. If you know conservatives, it’s pretty obvious there is no peaceful way out of our situation.

    • Mr Fish@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      You thinking of Victor orbarn (not sure if that’s the right spelling)

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Orban

        He was replaced with Peter Hungarian. No, I’m not kidding, that’s what the new guy’s last name (Magyar) means in Hungarian.

        Can’t wait for Trump’s reign to be over and John American to take over.