lemmy.net.au
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days ago

October 1

poptalk.scrubbles.tech

external-link
message-square
36
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • spooky_memes@lemmy.world
474
external-link

October 1

poptalk.scrubbles.tech

Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days ago
message-square
36
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • spooky_memes@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://poptalk.scrubbles.tech/post/4855549

October 1

  • UsernamesAreForSuckers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 days ago

    She always had them actually. The AT&T outfit hid them.

    • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      But why

      • criss_cross@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 days ago

        She explicitly did not want to be sexualized in those ads. She made IG stories about it.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          She was legit mad when she found out she had a reddit sub dedicated to her honkers.

          Also she’s in the hot chip hungry child video too.

          https://youtu.be/rOnMZALLQPk

        • nullspace@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Task failed.

      • funkajunk 🇨🇦@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because you dont need to sexualize the AT&T employees?

        • SippyCup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Exactly

          Jake from State farm though…

          • funkajunk 🇨🇦@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            HE CAN GET IT

        • Colloidal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          You don’t know my needs.

        • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          2 days ago

          But they are desexualising them

          • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            You’re implying women are to be sexualized by default, and that it’s a good thing

            • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Only partially. They could be implying that all humans, regardless of gender are to be sexualized by default and that’s a good thing. If that’s what they’re saying, then I agree with them wholeheartedly.

            • Kanda@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              No, he’s saying boobs are a good thing

            • multifariace@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              2 days ago

              I can sexualize everyone. I can also respect everyone as individuals with autonomy. Both can be true.

            • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              if not to be sexualized why is it sexual shaped?

              /s

            • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Remind us which parts of a human are sinful to acknowledge, and why more of those put women at a disadvantage again? It seems a little sexist.

              • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                It’s not a problem to acknowledge any body part or attraction to it. It’s weird to signal that ads not prioritizing showing off the boobies means they’re missing something (referring to the desexualizing comment).

                The actress has nice large breasts. Great, I like them too. AT&T didn’t rely on them to sell products, but instead decided to focus the viewer’s attention on their products and services. What’s wrong with that? It’s a mobile internet service, not Hooters.

              • finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Aorta. So sexy.

                • shartgargle@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I mean, people sexualize feet ffs.

          • troglodytis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 days ago

            Who’s they? She directed those commercials

            • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ow. If it’s by her own choice of course I’m ok with it

          • SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Implying that breasts (or women?) are inherently sexual?

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              Probably just the breasts, but not inherently, just sociologically. 🤷‍♂️

memes@lemmy.world

memes@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !memes@lemmy.world

Community rules

1. Be civil

No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politics

This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent reposts

Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No bots

No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop

No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

  • !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
  • !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
  • !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
  • !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.5K users / day
  • 6.11K users / week
  • 10.8K users / month
  • 21.4K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 22.8K subscribers
  • 4.99K Posts
  • 86.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@startrek.website
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org