I would like to hear the rationale for putting Buddhist theocracy to the right of Christian theocracy. Not saying it’s wrong; I don’t know enough about Buddhism to have a stance. But I’m familiar with Christianity and it’s hard to imagine anything out-fasching it.
“buddhism” is just a term to describe any worldview that comes from south-east asia. there’s more variety within buddhism than within christianity, and there you can find a whole lot of disagreements and different ways of life already.
Idk more kinds of Christians maybe? The spectrum is real broad. Ones like the UCC (United Church of Christ) come to mind as being alright. Still wouldn’t want any religion based government system though.
The post image was way better. Using the political compass unironically is dumb because reducing complex ideologies onto a 2d plane is so insanely reductive that the whole thing is just stupid.
what’s the belief that capitalism can work and can stay aligned with individual freedoms whilst providing a social security net, as long as a strict upper cap on wealth is unrelentingly enforced[1], such that the richest person in the world can only be 5x richer than the median person?
That just depends on how the axes are set. I could see it being the case that the centre is defined by the current status quo, which neoliberalism definitely is.
Where is autism
Hive-mind collectivism: Spawn more overlords neighs
I would like to hear the rationale for putting Buddhist theocracy to the right of Christian theocracy. Not saying it’s wrong; I don’t know enough about Buddhism to have a stance. But I’m familiar with Christianity and it’s hard to imagine anything out-fasching it.
“buddhism” is just a term to describe any worldview that comes from south-east asia. there’s more variety within buddhism than within christianity, and there you can find a whole lot of disagreements and different ways of life already.
Idk more kinds of Christians maybe? The spectrum is real broad. Ones like the UCC (United Church of Christ) come to mind as being alright. Still wouldn’t want any religion based government system though.
People putting fascism and Nazism in auth-center understood nothing about these ideologies. They’re auth-right all the way.
Arguably the Fully Automated Luxury Space Gay Communism was much less authoritarian than indicated.
But .ml told me that all forms of liberalism are actually fascism so most of the bottom half should be in authright.
.ml also tells of how clean and delicious dear leaders farts are
LIES! Dear leader’s body is so clean and efficient that it does not produce farts.
The post image was way better. Using the political compass unironically is dumb because reducing complex ideologies onto a 2d plane is so insanely reductive that the whole thing is just stupid.
Anything written on paper is on a 2d plane.
Listen here you little shit
deleted by creator
what’s the belief that capitalism can work and can stay aligned with individual freedoms whilst providing a social security net, as long as a strict upper cap on wealth is unrelentingly enforced[1], such that the richest person in the world can only be 5x richer than the median person?
say, by an omniscient omnipresent kill drone ↩︎
Fantasy
It sounds mostly like you’re describing geoism. The enforcement method is taxes on land. The more land you own, the harder we tax the shit out of you.
so you’re saying neolibs are good boys
Why
because they’re in the middle, mostly in the bottom of their image, and looking right
Nah
That just depends on how the axes are set. I could see it being the case that the centre is defined by the current status quo, which neoliberalism definitely is.
…neolibs are the square right and down from the center
…and that makes them as close to the centre as any of the other three squares closest to the centre.
yeeeees but the goodboy in the goodboy picture has more of his mass below the horizontal centre line and he is looking towards the right. ergo…
You may not like it but that’s how peak democracy looks like