I guess that settles the entire debate, in case anyone had any doubts.
If I were running a tech project, and elon musk offered to help I’d quickly begin questioning all of my life choices.
Well DHH is a Nazi fascist so he won’t be questioning anything.
This person assumes the best case for DHHs statements and excuses things by mentioning lack of information, but does not do the same for the person they are arguing against
This can of course be explained by them not realizing that, but that would mean that both the original post and this one are not thought out enough
You would question your choices because you don’t want to be the kind of person Musk would support.
This is everything DHH wants.
I feel like I am living in a simulation where the creators are just messing with us now. The headlines have just gotten too oniony over time.
Omarchy is so funny. There’s nothing interesting there (it’s just Arch with some questionable configs). It doesn’t solve any existing problem that wasn’t solved before, because it’s still Arch.
And yet the technofascists can’t stop supporting it. It must be virtue-signaling.
Wowie, you’ve credited another Arch fork derivative with a shitload of usage credit for your fourth-grade AI model. Surely this will have an impact on technology.
Then again, it’s a match made in heaven. Nobody cares about Omarchy, and about the same number of people would care about Grok if they couldn’t get pornography out of it.
This happens a lot. Every once in a while there is a technical “trend” that spikes on Twitter and everyone virtue signals to support. A recent example is Jev, or OpenClaw. Sometimes it’s a straight-up scam, like the old Reflection Llama 70B finetune that made Matt Shumer infamous.
Another one that’s such a distilled example, to me, is TurboQuant. It was this paper Google released on reducing the size of KV cache with a few stacked techniques: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19874
Hence the “Quant” part. And it generated a frenzy. CNBC was talking about it. Inference frameworks had to deal with hundreds of vibecoded PRs, everyone wanted it and was Tweeting about how it was going to leap LLMs forward.
…And it was nonsense.
Well. The paper wasn’t nonsense. It was a good paper.
But it mostly wasn’t new, or radical. Some engines (like exllama and some llama.cpp forks) had already implemented most of it (cache quantization, hadamard rotation) for YEARS, and no one cared. It worked alright, it was fine. But by the time Google published the paper, new attention schemes were making it entirely irrelevant anyway, yet people were acting like it was some kind of revolution.
And it may sound different, a linux distro vs a paper. But this is basically Omarchy.
The people hyping it (and funding it) don’t understand the first thing about it. They aren’t actually using it, probably. But it showed up in their Twitter feed, and now they’re compelled to virtue signal with their support for the Next Big Thing.
There’s nothing interesting there
Yet people can’t stop talking about it, positive or negative. Something is interesting.
well there’s the fash angle
Removed by mod
If you can’t argue your position without attacking a person’s character, you already lost the argument.
Easy for somebody not in the Linux community to say.
Lol. $1.5M in Grok tokens. The gooning and misinformation service.
The pedophilia and disinformation service.
The funny thing is that DHH isnt even doing anything with that much money to make Omarchy better, seems like all money is going into his pocket
It’s being funneled to aligned projects like hyprland and so on
Nazi OS
Thanks for the warning, I guess.
Of course they did. Omarchy is one of the only openly fascist-run Arch customizations.
“controversial”
mildly politically aligned
And watch while they claim $1.5MM in revenue and $1.5MM in “marketing” to juice their books just a bit more.
Is there a list of these asshole backers anywhere, so we all know who to boycott?
deleted by creator
