• GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s because our country was sold a long time ago. The Heritage assholes and Ronny Rayguns took their victory lap 45 years ago.

    Obedience and tolerance to the intolerable were beaten into anyone younger than that, and all they had to do was give the 1980s Americans an ever revolving target of innocent minorities to be the vessel of their contempt.

    Now there is nothing left to strip from the economy and the billionaires are now desperately looking for another place to loot, and there is nothing left. Thanks to globalism, they already ate the planet.

    If we don’t find a new way forward, capitalism is going to eat itself and us along with it.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Goes back way further than that… The simple fact is that America has never been a progressive nation that ever cared about social equity or equality.

      The reason Americans cannot protest like they do in france is because the American police system was molded off of the system the slave owning Confederates developed to fight against potential slave rebellions. A system that marries institutional violence from the state and extrajudicial violence from the populace with a ruling majority to maintain a strict social hierarchy.

      • GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve been thinking about what comes after, and I think an energy based economy is the future.

        Using watts as a currency, since any action in reality requires energy to change it’s state. Biological or otherwise.

        Covering everyone’s basic needs and then distributing the surpluses of energy to people to engage in commerce, research, recreation, etc.

        It removes the speculative nature of money, which is a side effect of the abstraction from reality that money is.

          • GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Except that isn’t the direct energy conversion of a unit of energy. I’m talking basing the economy off of an objective scientific standard.

            The petrodollar isn’t a good example because it just mandates that oil be traded for in USD, meaning it forced the demand for USD, but the dollar isn’t a direct conversion for a unit of oil.

            My basis is that electricity (or power in the physics sense) is the currency of reality. Energy states configures matter and govern how it behaves. On an economic level, the entire process of pulling ore from the ground, refining it, and turning it into a finished good requires equipment, which is another sub process requiring some material and energy cost, and energy to run the process. Since we have entered an age where information can be easily gathered via sensors, and processed so quickly, we can transfer to an economy that uses energy as currency directly. Especially as humans are further and further removed from the labor process via technology.

        • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Wouldn’t they just monpolize solar energy by hoarding the silicon resources? I feel like this wouldn’t solve exploitation or wealth disparities.

          • GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            In my opinion, Marx was right about the abolition of private ownership. Ownership is a social contract, and social contracts can change. A lot of wealth disparities come from this system of land ownership that promotes inefficient use of prime real estate through perverse incentives. And an entrenched class of landed gentry will always push a country towards autocracy.