resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 hours ago‘Who builds a ballpark next to a gun range?’: Coach injured by gunfire that crossed into baseball diamondwww.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1213arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1209arrow-down1external-link‘Who builds a ballpark next to a gun range?’: Coach injured by gunfire that crossed into baseball diamondwww.independent.co.ukresipsaloquitur@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 hours agomessage-square50fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTriumph@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·3 hours agoI said 100% and I meant 100%.
minus-squareFenrirIII@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 hours agoIt’s literally the (tort) law. I don’t think the armchair lawyers here understand anything
minus-squareColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 hours agoIf you’re defending\agreeing with Triumph, I don’t think you understand tort law.
minus-squareFenrirIII@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 hour agoLiterally just had a case in my Tort Law class about this very thing. I think you don’t know anything at all.
minus-squareColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·53 minutes agoI know in my scenario under tort, the gun range or someone further down in the construction of the range would be found liable, and not the shooter.
minus-squareColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·2 hours agoYour unwillingness to reason has made you out to be seen as stupid.
minus-squareTriumph@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 hours agoA question was asked. I answered it. Please indicate where I was “unwilling[] to reason”.
minus-squareColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·2 hours ago… The part where a shooter is always 100% responsible for the bullet.
I said 100% and I meant 100%.
It’s literally the (tort) law. I don’t think the armchair lawyers here understand anything
If you’re defending\agreeing with Triumph, I don’t think you understand tort law.
Literally just had a case in my Tort Law class about this very thing. I think you don’t know anything at all.
I know in my scenario under tort, the gun range or someone further down in the construction of the range would be found liable, and not the shooter.
Your unwillingness to reason has made you out to be seen as stupid.
A question was asked. I answered it. Please indicate where I was “unwilling[] to reason”.
… The part where a shooter is always 100% responsible for the bullet.
That’s because that’s true.