Companies approached by the eSafety commissioner this month about the requirement to prevent under 16s from holding social media accounts from 10 December have conducted a self-assessment that the commissioner will use to decide if they need to comply with the ban.
eSafety will not be formally declaring which service meets the criteria but companies that eSafety believes meet the criteria will be expected to comply.
The irony of this question is painful.
You just complained about what younger people do, and then you complained about being called out for it bevause someone “made it generational.”
You made it generational.
Uhm 👀
Where did I make it generational? Exactly?
Again, it’s an age thing, not a generational thing.
Let me explain it for you better.
When the gen z grows up they will still be generation z, but they will be older and smarter. Gen z is not going to stay under 16 forever.
When generation z grows up, there will be a next generation abc or whatever, that will be the new under 16s.
And so it has absolutely nothing to do with being generation x, y or z.
Does that make more sense?
If not go back to school.
Also, thanks for proving my point that most kids are stupid and have nothing to contribute to serious conversations.