Savvy countries will discover there’s a way to mitigate the harm incurred by Trump’s tariffs—and it’ll boost their own economies while making goods cheaper too.
Not if said Dem actually does something about it. (Unlikely)
Problem is that, if we elect a Democrat, it will be a fabulously wealthy person with no empathy or understanding of the working class and working poor, so the likelihood that they will do anything about it is minimal. Remember when Obama had the balls to walk into Flint, pretend to drink a glass of water, and tell all of those people whose water had been poisoned that everything was a-okay? That’s what I mean. Zero empathy.
Not at all the same. That started as targeted tariffs as punishment for accusations of unfair trade. Tariffs have been frequently used in the past and targeted tariffs can be an important tool for specific types of trade issues. It did escalate into a trade war which didn’t help anyone, but with one specific country.
That’s not at all the same as widespread tariffs, including starting trade wars against important allies and trade partners
There might be a valid argument somewhere in there that constantly changing the trade policy is worse than keeping a bad one in place? Not sure the trade-off there though. If you know you have a certain tariff in place long term, you can work around that and the tariff can actually do the things it is intended to do. If the tariff changes on a whim, you can’t and the country just becomes a more risky proposition to do business with.
Adopting and expanding terrible policy long term signals future intent.
Anecdote, one of the biggest doorlock companies (i don’t recall the name) started migrating inputs and trying to expand sales towards europe, and set up a factory to assemble doorlocks in Vietnam during the 2nd half of Biden’s presidency. The CEO saw Biden maintain the tariffs and correctly understood Trump’s trade policy was not an aberration, but a bipartisan consensus. Unstable signals might delay expansion as businesses wait to see, bipartisan hostile signals tell businesses their long term plans do not include the US.
Not if said Dem actually does something about it. (Unlikely)
Problem is that, if we elect a Democrat, it will be a fabulously wealthy person with no empathy or understanding of the working class and working poor, so the likelihood that they will do anything about it is minimal. Remember when Obama had the balls to walk into Flint, pretend to drink a glass of water, and tell all of those people whose water had been poisoned that everything was a-okay? That’s what I mean. Zero empathy.
More importantly, the last dem expanded on Trump pt I’s tarriffs.
Unless the next candidate acknowledges this, why would voters have any faith that candidate won’t be another Biden?
Honestly didn’t know that. Could you point me to a source where I can read more about it?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China–United_States_trade_war
2x Trump’s tarriff on solar panels, 3+x on evs, +25% on aluminum, batteries, and more
Not at all the same. That started as targeted tariffs as punishment for accusations of unfair trade. Tariffs have been frequently used in the past and targeted tariffs can be an important tool for specific types of trade issues. It did escalate into a trade war which didn’t help anyone, but with one specific country.
That’s not at all the same as widespread tariffs, including starting trade wars against important allies and trade partners
That’s the same bullshit justification Trump used. If the dems genuinely opposed with Trump’s trade war, they would have undone all his tariffs.
There might be a valid argument somewhere in there that constantly changing the trade policy is worse than keeping a bad one in place? Not sure the trade-off there though. If you know you have a certain tariff in place long term, you can work around that and the tariff can actually do the things it is intended to do. If the tariff changes on a whim, you can’t and the country just becomes a more risky proposition to do business with.
Adopting and expanding terrible policy long term signals future intent.
Anecdote, one of the biggest doorlock companies (i don’t recall the name) started migrating inputs and trying to expand sales towards europe, and set up a factory to assemble doorlocks in Vietnam during the 2nd half of Biden’s presidency. The CEO saw Biden maintain the tariffs and correctly understood Trump’s trade policy was not an aberration, but a bipartisan consensus. Unstable signals might delay expansion as businesses wait to see, bipartisan hostile signals tell businesses their long term plans do not include the US.
Thanks for sharing!