In particular:

  • Education Cannot Wait (Geneva, Switzerland)
  • European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats (Helsinki, Finland)
  • Forum of European National Highway Research Laboratories (Brussels, Belgium)
  • Freedom Online Coalition (The Hague, The Netherlands)
  • Global Community Engagement and Resilience Fund (Geneva, Switzerland)
  • Global Counterterrorism Forum (The Hague, The Netherlands)
  • Global Forum on Cyber Expertise (The Hague, The Netherlands)
  • Global Forum on Migration and Development (Geneva, Switzerland)
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Geneva, Switzerland)
  • Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Bonn, Germany)
  • International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (Rome, Italy)
  • International Development Law Organization (Rome, Italy)
  • International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (Stockholm, Sweden)
  • International Institute for Justice and the Rule of Law (Malta)
  • International Lead and Zinc Study Group (Lisbon, Portugal)
  • International Solar Alliance (Paris, France)
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature (Gland, Switzerland)
  • Regional Cooperation Council (Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herzegovina)
  • Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (Paris, France)
  • Science and Technology Center in Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine)
  • Venice Commission of the Council of Europe (Strasbourg, France)
  • International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (The Hague, The Netherlands)
  • International Trade Centre (Geneva, Switzerland)
  • UN Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (part of FAO, Rome, Italy)
  • UN Conference on Trade and Development (Geneva, Switzerland)
  • UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (Bonn, Germany)
  • UN Institute for Training and Research (Geneva, Switzerland)
  • UN System Staff College (Turin, Italy)
  • UN Water (Geneva, Switzerland)
  • vdbm@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have seen it pointed out that some of these 66 agencies are really platforms, treaties and commissions, not organisations. Is there an analysis of this?

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Being in international organisations is soft power, and Trump doesn’t like soft. Trump likes it hard.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    You know what? If the US want to remove itself from influence, I’m fine with that at this juncture.

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      If the US want to remove itself from influence

      But they don’t. They are simply governed by morons who want to replace all that “nonsense” with the only actual influence they understand military force.

      • axh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        They are simply governed by morons

        Who is a real moron? A moron who governs or morons who elected them?

        • adr1an@programming.devM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Who elected them? It’s no democracy when the votes have a weighting factor to make iliterate votes from rural areas more important.

          • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah, the electoral is bullshit and needs to change, and I’m sure that has a suppressing effect on voter turnout…however, that piece of turd still won the popular vote. The majority of people either voted for him or, burdened with supreme ignorance and/or over-riding main-character syndrome, decided not to vote. Which is effectively the same thing.

            • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Idk even then you sort of have the 24/7 propaganda machine + Russian bots that were proven to be spreading false information to help trump win. Billions were spent helping him win, along with deliberate interference from Russia, and he still barely won.

              • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Sure. There was a lot of fuckery, no doubt. A whole lot of variables that influenced both voter turnout and voter votes. I wonder if we’ll do a better job at teaching how to identify and combat propaganda when/if we get to the other side of this stain. It’s too effective with this population.

            • adr1an@programming.devM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ah, never looked into the numbers of this second presidency. I guess that bullet he “dodged” did give him an unexpected appeal… Sad.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      This doesn’t stop the externalized effects of US internal policy from affecting the rest of the world.

        • vdbm@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I posted it to understand how it was affecting the rest of the world, and Europe in particular, not to make a reflection on wider US policy. So far I haven’t heard reactions from the UN, from the EU, from the governments of EU member states, or from the mayors of the cities that host these organisations.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    International Lead and Zinc Study Group (Lisbon, Portugal)

    They really want to replenish the lead generation.

  • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If they don’t like the UN, maybe they should also give up their seat and their veto power on the security council?

  • hoppygarden@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago
    • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Geneva, Switzerland)

    IPCC … they withdraw from IPCC … sure, why not, wt$#&#&#@@$$$#&#&

  • glasratz@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The White House has become so untrustworthy that you can’t even believe that.

      • glasratz@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        The announcement. The source here is the official website of the white house. So you can’t trust this list unless the organizations mentioned confirm it.

    • rose56@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      They gonna arrest them and deport them! May also bomb them, pick and choose situation./J

      • vdbm@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s a bit of a polemic comment. Nothing of this will happen. We are talking about 66 small organisations all over the world.

  • vdbm@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is there any discussion (anywhere!) on what this might imply for these Europe-based international organisations (funding, staffing, projects)?

    • vdbm@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I know, but my intention was not to have a debate on Stephen Miller (on which I have much to say but this is not the forum), but on the implications in Europe for this Europe-based international organisations. Nobody has written about this so far.

  • vdbm@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Many of these organisations, also funded by the EU or EU member states (17 are EU-based), are now suddenly in serious financial disarray. I doubt that the EU will react and these organisations are too small and too institutional to react much themselves. I know a couple of them (besides the IPCC, which we all know) and can confirm that they do great work.