Edit context: Hasan is calling out right-wingers for getting upset about leftists carrying guns.

    • fennesz12@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I hope that this is not hyperbole, but that you american democrats are actively considering it. I briefly scanned the no stupid questions Lemmy community, and as a non-american, a lot of this has me worried. There is so much terror from ICE. I’ll post on X, arguing against the barrage of misinformation about my country from MAGA supporters, and there will be occasional Americans calling “Please help us!” to EU citizens.

      You may need to start stocking a bit more in the pantry. Start talking to your neighbors in case the insanity starts to land on your doorstep. Consider what options you have in terms of the second amendment. During his first term it may have seen like a fluke, but with the growing inequality, harsher policies, economic protectionism…

      Elon Musk on X is attempting to start a grassroots movement for implement voter ID. What will this grassroots movement turn into under Trump? Trump is “jokingly” talking about canceling the midterms. You may say he is not able to accomplish this, but who knows what will happen? The divide between democrats and republicans are now so large that it may lead to civil war if it continues.

      People dismiss these things. It seems like a slow moving train wreck. It feels like something that only happens on TV. We think there are rules and regulations to prevent it from happening. What rules? What regulations? Are there any left in the US that can’t be bought or intimidated?

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Every protest needs to have a line of armed people standing right in front.

    That, more than anything, will make ICE think twice before attacking. (Because they’re pussies.)

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    21 hours ago

    “You want to live in a world without the need for guns, yet you use them when necessary. Curious! I am very intelligent.”

  • sunbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    The fact that they said “leftists” instead of “liberals” made me think they weren’t a right-winger.

    Even liberals call most leftists liberals…

    I got more context from the thread.

  • PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m not a big fan of guns. But fuck these losers for having a problem with people displaying their guns. Suck a donkey dick ya pussies.

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 days ago

    Reminds me back in the day was browsing a socialist gun subredditt at my brother’s house and my brother was shocked. He said “socialist have guns!”

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Most leftists don’t think all guns are always bad so I’m not sure what value they’re supposedly turning on here. Pretty sure the prevailing complaint on the left is about how easy it is to acquire a firearm, not that people have them.

    I support people’s right to own weapons but it should be a lot harder to purchase and there should be MUCH greater punishments if the weapon you own is used in a shooting (I’m thinking parents of school shooters who poorly secured their guns)

    • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      These people don’t understand nuance. If you’re against general unrestricted availability of guns, but are not against all availability of guns, you’ve already lost them, they’ll label you as “anti-gun nut” and then be shocked if you say you own a gun, call you “out” on turning on your own convictions.

    • yum_burnt_toast@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      118
      ·
      2 days ago

      i dont think that comment is in reference to leftists turning on an antigun stance but right wing media turning on their hardline 2nd amendment stance to vilify them for it

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      In addition to your last sentence, the most stolen item is firearms. If it isn’t secured properly, what happens with it should be on you, even if it’s stolen. If it was secured properly and they still got to it, like breaking open a secure gun safe (not a cheap Walmart one), what happens with it after should not be your fault.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, that’s absolutely what I mean. If your kid takes your gun to school, you did a shit job securing it

    • unmagical@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      I read that as Hasan questioning the MAGAt if there was any value rightoids won’t forfeit since they are stereotypically very 2A and now this guy’s positing as if owning guns to guard against a tyrannical government is bad.

      If he was trying to criticize leftists or liberals, why’d he choose a right wing source of the news to react to?


      To be fair, I don’t really watch Hasan, so it’s possible my interpretation is completely wrong as clarified in one of his streams.

      • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, that’s how I read it too.

        The thing about reactionaries is that they think rules are for other people. It’s only hypocritical if one takes them at their word, but they only care about winning points in arguments. They’ll argue any position if they can twist it into sounding reasonable, and they’ll steal the language of liberation from the left to do so.

        Their singular principle is that entrenched power must defend itself, because they know benefits them directly. They sincerely don’t care about the second amendment; they don’t think it applies to everyone, only “real” Americans who look and act like white supremacists.

    • tino_408@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      How could you make it harder? Imagine if it was hard for all the new gun owners in Minnesota? I’m guessing you just want to make the rules?

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        In my opinion, there should be mandatory training and testing to check that you know how to store and operate your firearm properly. You should also be required to own a secure place to store it.

        The training and testing should be paid for by taxes though (at least the first time) so poor people aren’t restricted from gun ownership.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Basically, though I believe that does not require you to be certified for the gun you’re purchasing. It just requires general knowledge. I think it should go further.

            Also, that is not a federal requirement to purchase a firearm. It’s only required in some jurisdictions.

            Ideally, it should also require fairly frequent practice. This rule would be hard to enforce though.

            • tino_408@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              All guns work the same. Only different is the action (how to load the gun) and there are only a few subcategories. How other people vote and decide to run there town is out of our hands. This idea that guns are hard to use is quite the contrary they are designed for anybody to use that’s why they are so deadly. Less then 1% of legal gun owners do a crime with there legally owned guns. USA doesn’t have a gun issue we have a criminal and mental health issue. Criminals do not follow any guns laws causing regular citizens to be outgunned. And we should ask ourselves what is going on in society that is causing people to shoot themselves? But you’re proving my point you just want the rules to be your way. How each state and country decide there laws is what true democracy stands for.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Yeah, militaries spend time training with specific weapons just for fun…

                Sure, every gun uses gunpowder to fire a round. The methods they handle this can be fairly different, though it isn’t incredibly important. The important thing is, when it comes time to use it, that you’re familiar with the gun you have. If you aren’t then you’ll be slower. You also need to know how to clean it, and how the safety mechanism work (whether there is a safety switch, etc), and where it is on your gun.

                Owning one should be a responsibity. If you aren’t ready to operate it then you don’t need to own one. Best case, if you need it you’ll be too slow and useless to be able to. Worst case, it’s stolen and used to commit a crime, and this isn’t unlikely. Firearms are, IIRC, the most frequently stolen item.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m obviously talking about states with weak gun laws, not the people in the photo. Minnesota’s firearm regulations are fine.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Second Amendment is meant for SHOOTING SCHOOLS and TODDLERS SHOOTING PARENTS NOT Protecting your Neighborhoods!

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Why do people think that’s a leftist?

    Sounds like every single american who sees masked guys in their neighborhood and hasn’t turned on the news in a couple years.

  • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    You’re not a hypocrite for following the current law and also wanting to change the same law.

    One opinion is about what an individual’s best choice is, given the situation.

    The other is about what laws would be best for a society to have.

    What’s best for an individual is not always the same as what’s best for a group or society.

    • dogbert@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Real leftism has always been pro-gun. This liberal anti-gun nonsense is childish.

      • Master@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Its not childish. In fact the Democrat leaders that push for it are the same ones trying to betray the american people at every turn. Which makes it a Republican Tactic to keep Democrat voters defenSeless and further more to make them think it is their own idea to be defenseless.

        Its a wild and crazy mentality to have, I know, and yet here we are in a world where Republicans dont want Democrats to have protection from them and Democrats also dont want Democrats to have protections from Republicans.

        • lolo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          The state should not have the power to brutalize its own people. They should not have a monopoly on violence. Never again.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          To add to this, political speech (much like online discourse) benefits from flattening.

          Nuance (I enjoy guns and am pro-gun but I think there should be controls in place to make it more difficult for people who are likely to kill to obtain them) is harder to argue against and harder to make stick in people’s minds.

    • almost1337@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      The problem that we frequently run into is people who only want what’s best for them at the cost of society, while still wanting full benefits of being a member of said society.

  • Darkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Oh my god! You hypocrite! You are not supposed to fight back! You have morals remember?!?”

    • Asafum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      A friend just messaged me that Mississippi jumped from 50th to 8th in reading comprehension, not because they suddenly did better, but because everyone else did so much worse.

      This thread confirms that.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        They actually put a lot of time and effort into public education. Turns out, providing more resources to students and teachers has positive outcomes on education. Pretty much proves that the shitty education kids get in southern states is a choice.