CAVOK@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 1 day agoUK 'will sign up to EU single market rules even without deal ' - Reevesinews.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up187arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up184arrow-down1external-linkUK 'will sign up to EU single market rules even without deal ' - Reevesinews.co.ukCAVOK@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square34fedilinkfile-text
Paywall? https://removepaywalls.com/https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/uk-sign-eu-single-market-rules-deal-reeves-4228840
minus-squareSkua@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·24 hours agoSo why bring up the navy in this context?
minus-squaredeHaga@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·7 hours agoIt’s what the UK brings to the table militarily. Do you not think that’s relevant with Russian and American direction of travel?
minus-squareSkua@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 hours agoOf course I think it’s relevant, what I don’t understand is how the EU needs the UK more tha vice versa when the EU is bringing more to the table (including in terms of naval capacity)
minus-squaredeHaga@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoI didn’t say that. I said the EU needs the UK more for access to a global financial hub. The military aspect has just become a lot more relevant.
So why bring up the navy in this context?
It’s what the UK brings to the table militarily. Do you not think that’s relevant with Russian and American direction of travel?
Of course I think it’s relevant, what I don’t understand is how the EU needs the UK more tha vice versa when the EU is bringing more to the table (including in terms of naval capacity)
I didn’t say that. I said the EU needs the UK more for access to a global financial hub. The military aspect has just become a lot more relevant.