I had someone apply for a job through a recruiter at my company and passed the interview with flying colors. However, it has come across after the interview that they may not have the legal ability to work. The company I work for is audited regularly, so I can’t have hiring them swept under the rug.

How do I deal with this without jepordizing the applicant?

  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    I really hope you mean to say “hiring” instead of “hitting”

    The simple answer is just don’t hire them, and don’t give any reason.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.clubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Yeah, I am hiring. I edited this.

      My issue is trying to unwind this as humanely as possible for the applicant.

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Unless there’s some method for you to help them become eligible to work in your country, you legally need to put the company’s safety first. If you give different reason to hide things you could be exposing your company to liability, so the safest option for both the company and for the applicant is for you to straight up ghost them.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.clubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          24 hours ago

          The problem is that there is a recruiter as a middleman. This would be a lot easier if there wasn’t a third party fiscally interested in this.

          • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            It’s pretty simple, the candidate didn’t meet the requirements.

            Not sure why you’re involved, this is an HR and legal issue. If HR said they don’t have docs showing eligibility, then that needs to be reported to the recruiter, otherwise they’re going to recommend this person to somewhere else, and run into the same issue. How would you feel if you were in their shoes?

            Whether someone can legally work somewhere is not your problem to solve, unless you can actually do something, like help them submit appropriate paperwork (I’ve done this for employees who were temps, to help them get more permanent status).

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            21 hours ago

            the recruiter should have vetted them better. Part of the reason to go through a recruiter is to avoid these things.

          • Fermion@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            The recruiter sent you an inelligible candidate. That’s just as much their problem as it is yours.

          • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Yehn just tell the recruiter that they were impressive in interview but seemed not suitable in the role.

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            23 hours ago

            What if it’s also a trap set by trump goons. Wouldn’t put it past them.