• SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Do they just jail those convicted of this, or do they also require undergoing significant therapy during the sentence? Because if they don’t, they’re only going to ensure increased levels of the anger & resentment which led to those extremist views to begin with.

  • DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I year in prison seems excessive to me for a 40 second speech. I could imagine a few hundred hours of community service.

    People kill cyclists and get less punishment than this idiot.

    • trajekolus@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      As time passed, and History got devalued as a subject in favour of technology subjects, I guess it was always inevitable that people would lose awareness of what Fascism is, and why it should not be allowed to return.

  • FreedomAdvocate
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Jailed for “inciting hatred”…… Jesus Christ we’re a joke of a country.

    The guys a racist fucking moron, but jailing people for voicing their opinions is terrifying and authoritarian. I hope anyone celebrating this remembers their reaction when people with opposing views to them are in power throwing people in jail over words.

    • finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/politics/queensland/crisafulli-insists-his-hate-speech-laws-will-stand-the-test-of-time-20260218-p5o3d2.html

      Crisafulli in QLD wants up to 2 years in prison for anyone saying ‘from the river to the sea’ as well as ‘globalise the intifada’.

      Also: “The ban will also apply to any phrases, spoken or written, decided by the attorney-general of the day”.

      decided by the attorney-general of the day

      EDIT: I hope everywhere he goes, someone plays ‘Two Strong Hearts’ by John Farnham.

      • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s wild that pro-Palestine/anti-israel protestors are being lumped in with neo Nazis. Particularly when Israelis and neo Nazis have so many common opinions …

      • fizzle@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Context is really important.

        I agree that the QLD legislation is scary - it’s bullshit that their legislation is going to “proscribe” that specific phrase, so if one utters it then that’s an offense regardless of intent or context.

      • FreedomAdvocate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        11 hours ago

        That concept is, pardon my French, complete bullshit.

        Remember - you’re being intolerant of people who hold views you don’t like. Think what these laws mean when, not if, people with opposing views to you get in power.

        • TheLunatickle@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          It’s not about being intolerant of views you “don’t like” it’s about being intolerant of intolerant views, that’s why it’s a paradox. Personal feelings aren’t involved only whether the view seeks to persecute another.

          The fact you’re assuming anyone calling out intolerance is doing it from an emotional position implies some rather distressing things about your world view tbh.

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It really is.

          The thing is it has very strong im-15-and-this-is-deep energy and it has it’s own wikipedia page and it’s something that every idiot on lemmy and reddit has heard of and it makes them feel superior to trot it out at every opportunity.

          The irony is, as you say, every time someone references the paradox of intolerance they’re literally invoking it in order to justify being intolerant.

          Yes, it’s true that some opinions and behaviors should not be tolerated. However, the things which we as a society choose not to tolerate need to be very carefully considered in each and every instance.

          The paradox of intolerance allows one to merely brand a person or group of people you don’t like as being “intolerant” and then you’re free to exclude them from your circle of tolerance.

    • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Yep. Pretty sure the magistrate’s last name is Germanic, too. Went to German elementary school for a couple years as a child decades ago, and they really tended to make the kids feel guilty for the sins of their fathers.

      The 34-year-old took the stage at the end of the march and endorsed neo-Nazi views before being immediately arrested by police.

      On Wednesday, he was sentenced at Downing Centre local court to 12 months behind bars for intentionally inciting hatred.

      The magistrate, Sharon Freund, criticised Koschel’s 40-second speech – in which he twice called Jews the “greatest enemy” – as clearly antisemitic and vilifying a vulnerable community.