he usually left the keys on the wall of his home and that the car was accessible to more than 20 extended family members.
And the fact that the magistrate was displaying very obvious bias and behaving illegally by preventing the justice process from playing out properly? And that the police failed to adequately explain his rights, and charged him on the basis that he had not exercised them correctly?
The evidence was exceptionally weak, and justice clearly was not done in the first instance.
So you just ignored this part?
And the fact that the magistrate was displaying very obvious bias and behaving illegally by preventing the justice process from playing out properly? And that the police failed to adequately explain his rights, and charged him on the basis that he had not exercised them correctly?
The evidence was exceptionally weak, and justice clearly was not done in the first instance.