• itisileclerk@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    But in fact USA and Israel are the countries that spy on anyone. I am more concern about USA and Israel spying than from India and China. In this point in history USA and Israel are the enemy of the world.

    • shane@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      All countries spy on each other.

      I definitely agree about being more worried about the US spying than China though.

    • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      https://www.ic3.gov/PSA/2026/PSA260312

      Compromised devices already comprise what amounts to a foothold within US network infrastructure that makes attribution of actors and defense of critical infrastructure impossible.

      It’s actually a really good situation for China since they have access to millions of these compromised devices in police stations, fire stations, hospitals, within critical infrastructure networks etc.

      Also, the equivalent of mail censorship is already being done by more subtle means.

      The US is more fucked than you know. I just hope the US doesn’t piss china off too much. The asymmetric warfare will claim more lives of civilians than combatants.

    • jobbies@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      13 hours ago

      If you’re not happy how about instead of whining you get off your arse and do something about it?

      Rest of us are bored of it all.

      • FrankFrankson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Well tell us your four point plan about how to overthrow the US government and take back control. You can base it on one of the numerous revolutions you have obviously been a part of. It’s not like you are just some asshole who doesn’t really know anything about it and you are just greatly oversimplifying the situation…that couldn’t be it.

        • jobbies@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Sorry I don’t have white privilage

          I’ve heard a lot of excuses from Americans but this one is brand new.

          • toad@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            No but that’s fine, he voted harris. His opinion was heard and rejected. Nothing else he can do

            • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              As someone who’s working on starting a diyhrt homebrew and joining the SRA: unless you’ve lived through the rise of fascism stfu, chances are if you lived here you’d be doin jack shit too.

              Fascism/late stage capitalism is exhausting by design. If I didn’t spend the past decade removing corporate software from my computers I don’t even know how I’d be comfortable doing any of this safely

              Proper privacy in today’s day in age requires, at least, an understanding of Linux systems administration/, basic network architecture, and virtualization.

              That’s before we talk about neutralizing ME.

              If you’re not splitting your identities/footprint across several permanent and burner VM’s w/ different public IP’s you’re probably doing it wrong.

              How is that reasonable to expect out of the average person?

              • toad@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                Yeal well seriously, tomorrow the nazis are marching in my city near me, and I will be there. They want to remigrate my family. I don’t need 5 VPNs, i need to leave my phone at home and physically go there.

                Sorry friend im not your enemy. But quit thinking of yourself as the main victim when your country’s bombing people for breakfast. I spent 3 years comforting my wife as her friends were getting widowed or orphaned. And guess what, harris was still in power. So less voting and more doing, chopchop.

                Stay safe

                • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  Yeal well seriously, tomorrow the nazis are marching in my city near me, and I will be there. They want to remigrate my family. I don’t need 5 VPNs, i need to leave my phone at home and physically go there.

                  Your medicine you need to live isn’t actively being made illegal. The FDA is already being petitioned to make lists of us. There prepping to fucking camp us. This isn’t something I need to protest its something Im going to need to live.

                  But quit thinking of yourself as the main victim when your country’s bombing people for breakfast.

                  Did I say I was?

                  So less voting and more doing, chopchop.

                  Read the previous comment and try again.

                  Sorry friend im not your enemy

                  No, but this holier than thou attitude like you’re the only one willing to do something is obnoxious.

        • stringere@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Call up your local NAACP and find activist groups to be a part of. Advocate for yourself instead of waiting for whitey to save you from the mess they created.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Well it does say consumer-grade. Not sure what the reasoning there is, as backdoors in enterprise equipment would be much worse for national security

      • Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Producers of consumer-grade routers that receive Conditional Approval from DoW or DHS can continue to receive FCC equipment authorizations. Interested applicants are encouraged to submit applications to conditional-approvals@fcc.gov

        A very speculative, cynical interpretation: something of value will be exchanged for the privilege of conditional approval.

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Enterprise grade equipment comes with entire teams dedicated to securing it, with various overlapping services intended to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities. Along with enterprise level agreements around usage and support.

        Consumer grade is just fire and forget, you’re on your own.

  • Paranoid Factoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I can understand the FTC being involved because trade. But the FCC? Maybe regulatory authority over WiFi? But this seems like massive over reach.

    Remember when conservatives claimed to support smaller government?

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      How about the bit where they say home routers have to be approved by the DHS or the “Department of War”? This is not normal.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Remember when conservatives claimed to support smaller government?

      I only remember when conservatives lied everytime they opened their mouths.

      • shane@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        36 minutes ago

        Yeah, Reagan was always talking about small government, and then he blew up the deficit with unchecked spending. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      They still do claim that, but every federal republican administration since I have been born has spent more than it brought in, and has a less fiscally conservative record than every administration from the other major party, whom they tarred as fiscally irresponsible the entire time. I am almost 50.

    • halowpeano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I mean… “Small government” Republicans were always demonstrably lying, as far back as any of them have been alive. Every one of them just wanted to shift money from things that support people to the pockets of their donors.

  • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The excuse that it’s for security reasons just immediately falls apart when you get to this part of the article:

    The notice from the FCC states that companies can apply for conditional approval for new products from the Department of War or the Department of Homeland Security. However, that requires the businesses to provide a plan for shifting at least some of their manufacturing to the US in order to receive that conditional approval.

    So it’s fine to supposedly threaten national security if you do some more manufacturing in the US? Uh-huh. How does that balance out exactly?

    • Angrydeuce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The unwritten part is where Trump gets a free gold plated golf cart or some other stupid shit to sweeten the deal.

      Its grift allllll the way down.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I hate to say anything that would defend any of this, but cheap Chinese routers are very prone to security issues. There’s a guy that has a youtube channel built arond taking apart and reverse engineering all kids of electroncis. He’s found some pretty bad stuff in generic routers, static logins, telemetry sent home, remote executable code in the admin portal while not logged in.

      I agree there’s a lot more here they hope to gain, and that those gains are their primary objective, but there are some real issues from consumer network electronics.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        That may be true and is certainly a well known concern …. Yet given the US government’s recent history, I have a hard time believing much of what they say

        Cheap Chinese routers as a risk being true doesn’t prevent it from also being true that the current us administration is full of shit and likely more concerned about enriching someone connected to them, or tilt at windmills

      • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        There’s better ways to do it then, EU don’t have that problem for example, and we buy plenty from China.

        We just have safety and security standards enshrined into law, and don’t deal with anyone that doesn’t agree to follow them.

        It’s why some products have the C€ symbol on them, which is “this has been imported, and meets all legal requirement”, and all shops are not allowed to sell anything without that cert if imported.

        (Though this don’t apply to direct-to-consumer delivery from other nations, so it’s not bulletproof)

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          That’s kinda what’s going on. They’re pulling the FCC logo and making it illegal to resell without authorization. Hopefully, (but not assuredly) part of that authorization will be to make sure they comply with security.

          Though I’m absolutely certain those ‘agreements’ cost a pretty penny and it’s lining someone’s pocket as well.

          • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Ah but the C€ don’t require you to manufacture some or all parts in the country though, or to pay a fee for the courtesy of dodging the law

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              pay a fee for the courtesy of dodging the law

              Not that i’d be suprised for it to be so, but conditional approval doesn’t automatically mean pay a fee and we don’t check.

      • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        If I read this right it goes beyond the cheap no-name Chinese stuff that we hopefully all know to avoid by now. This would prevent US companies from outsourcing manufacture to foreign countries, which pretty much all companies do at this point

    • MortUS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      In the Age of Technology and AI, it does make sense to have any manufacturing operations in house than overseas. Ofc if there were countries we could trust that would be onpar as well, but the U.S. pretty much shit the bed on alliances.

      • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Sounds like it’s just a modern version of Indulgences to me.

        You have all sinned against God America, but if you pay the donation to the church government then you will be given access to heaven America

  • Pulsar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    24 hours ago

    The only explanation that makes sense to me is that this is a law to:

    1. get bribes or favors from telecom equipment manufacturers.
    2. Create a framework to force backdoors into consumer equipment.
    3. Force users to use ISP provided equipment.
    • trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Create a framework to force backdoors into consumer equipment.

      Ding ding ding

      First thought upon seeing this headline. How long until we see the great firewall of USA?

    • notthebees@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      ISP provided equipment is also made outside of the US. This affects way more than just telecom stuff

  • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Build your own open WRT router or get one of theirs. It’s the best way to go and you don’t get dragged through the monthly fee wringer for stupid child security or other stuff that is not well designed.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Even more isolationism. Knowing how the usa works, they discovered the equipment was set up for spying on their people and they want all of that “spying on their own people” power for themselves.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      they want all of that “spying on their own people” power for themselves.

      My assumption as well, after after the video release in the Guthrie case, we know objectively that every device with a microphone or camera and a wireless connection is spying on us and feeding the data to the US government without a warrant too.

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This only applies to routers.

    It’s not widely known outside the ham radio community, but part of the 2.4GHz wifi band overlaps the 13cm amateur radio band. If you turn off 5GHz wifi and lock the 2.4GHz AP to Channel 1, it qualifies as a ham radio, and can be sold as a ham radio instead of an AP/Router. You do need a ham radio license to operate it as a Ham AP, but you do not need a license to buy a Ham AP.

    If the end user wants to turn on 5GHz after the fact, there is not a damn thing the FCC can do about it.

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      That deals with the need for a WiFi access point, but not the main router functionality. Another approach would be a low-power PC running OPNsense or PFsense with a WiFi card repurposed as an access point. Or, if the new policy concerns only routers and not access points, a PC for the router plus a dedicated WiFi access point (some device that is not capable of being a router).

    • evil_andy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      But you can’t run encryption on it. So that means no WEP, no WPA, no SSL, TLS, VPN, etc.

      So yes, while you could run your own wireless access point, it doesn’t solve the main requirement for most people which is privacy.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        You aren’t understanding my point.

        My point is that you can continue to import and sell the exact same physical device, just with a little change in marketing, and possibly software.

        My point is this: Once you have acquired the device, there is fuck all the FCC can do about you converting your “ham radio” back into a consumer-grade router.

        • kalpol@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          24 hours ago

          This is technically not true, the FCC can and does enforce spectrum usage rules. Whether they will expend resources chasing down your router or your unlicensed GMRS is another matter.

  • apftwb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    TPLink needed to get their shit in order for years. This has been cooking since 2019. However, this administration is just turned it into a bribery scheme.

  • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I have done a couple similar setups. Fun facts: cell towers have asymmetrical signal and if you are too close, your signal is bad. Those are hard ones to explain to farmers that have towers installed on their properties.