The vast data centers that power artificial intelligence are so energy hungry that they’re heating up their surroundings, according to new research. It’s an alarming finding given the number of data centers is predicted to explode over the next few years.

  • xXSirDanglesXx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I sometimes work in the building that’s in the thumbnail of the article, that’s crazy to see.

    But that being said, data centers are definitely a negative for the environment and using them for bogus AI nonsense is horrible.

  • DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Strikingly, the impacts weren’t limited to a data center’s immediate surroundings; temperature increases affected areas up to 6.2 miles away, the research found, affecting more than 340 million people.

    Huh?

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        But un a radius of 6 mi? That sounds a bit high.
        More close to a city with lots of concrete to store the heat.

        • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Large data centers can consume over 100 MW of power. Almost ALL the energy a computer consumes is turned into heat, like well over 90%. A home AC unit pulls a little under 1 kW, and I think heating is about the same so that’s equivalent to heating over 100,000 homes, except those homes will eventually get warm and stop running the heat. The data center churns all day, every day. Given that, it may be equivalent to all the heat put out in more like 250,000 homes. Data centers produce an ABSURD amount of heat.

          Edit: and keep in mind, that’s HOMES, not people. Average people per household in the US is 2.5, so that’s heating for over 600,000 people.

          • filcuk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Sorry to nitpick but doesn’t 100% of it end up as heat? Vibrations, light, sounds, radio waves- all a tiny fraction of the power are also eventually absorbed by the environment.
            That was my understanding at least

  • cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The graphs in the paper show the temperature 1 km away from the data center being 8°C higher and attribute that to heat emitted by the data center. That should start the alarm bells that something isn’t right with this paper.

    Here’s a post going into the problems with it;

    https://blog.andymasley.com/p/data-centers-heat-exhaust-is-not?open=false#§my-core-claim-this-is-literally-just-measuring-hot-surfaces-of-new-buildings-and-the-soil-and-land-around-those-new-buildings-probably-hasnt-changed-temperature-at-all

    • tb_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Where do you think the heat from that heatsink eventually goes? The only way to get “rid” of it is into the air or the water.

    • Napster153@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      But won’t someone think of the TechnoFeudalists!

      Think of all the money they can’t spent on hedonism and depravity!

    • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Only a handful of countries use Fahrenheit, but they’re still too arrogant to add the unit. I get not including Celsius because of the target audience, and dropping the unit in conversation but this isn’t that

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          For temperature, not really. Both Celsius and Fahrenheit are useful for different things.

          Fahrenheit is great for what we feel (it’s related to body temperature for the high end, and the freezing point of brine on 0).

          Celsius is great for cooking, or applications where you care about what water is doing (0 is freezing, 100 is boiling).

          Neither uses different scales, like other metric units increasing by 10s (at least, I’ve never seen anything like kC). If you’re doing that, you’re using Kelvin, which is a fundamental base temperature, where 0 is actually 0, which makes more sense for physics and math, but is less useful for what we feel.

          I think the US should switch, just to make it easier to communicate, and other metric scales actually are better. C and F are both equally useful for different things though. Neither is actually a better scale.

      • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        13 hours ago

        If only we could harness the energy of people bitching about not using Celsius we could power the whole world.

        • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Ahaha. I’m not even bitching about that. I’m doing that pedantic thing that physics teachers do where they point out the number without the units isn’t correct

          That said, if the US just used SI units…

  • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Years ago, I was driving through NY city-ish. We pulled over in a rest area and I saw a sign about turning your engine off. I thought it was the stupidest thing I had ever seen, as did many other people apparently as their cars were idling. Then I got out of my car. I was wrong. The heat was insane. I couldn’t wrap my little head around it. I started doing the engineer math thing because it didn’t make sense.

    Doesn’t surprise me at all these massive data centers are creating little heat domes. The cars were bad enough, and they are a fraction of the energy.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      100% of electricity burned turns to heat save light that leaves earth. Gigawatt data center? That’s ~650,000 1500w space heaters.

      • expatriado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        ·
        18 hours ago

        i work for a large power company, we have a data center customer that have as many equally sized cooling towers as one of our nuclear power plants.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            You’ll need the same number of cooling towers for the computers too. All the energy created by the reactor will turn into heat, essentially doubling the amount of cooling needed.

          • ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Didn’t Microsoft try to pay for a nuclear plant to be recommissioned just to power a data centre or something?

            • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              15 hours ago

              There have been several data centers that have bought nuclear plants, including Three Mile Island, they’re going to fire that bitch back up, also the Regulators have been disempowered. Propublica on the last part if I recall.

              • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 hours ago

                something tells me Datancenters power needs will exceed that of old nuclear plants, since they are tyring to expand.

          • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            Nuclear plants to power data centers to make ai slop to make more need for data centers to feed us ai ad slop…when does it fucking end?

            I hope some vigilantes start taking action against these damn wastes of space.

            • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Have you seen the movie Bugonia? I’m nearly convinced that CEO’s are all human looking aliens that are determined to destroy earth and enslave humans. #tinfoilhat #downtherabbithole

            • BanMe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              14 hours ago

              The disease is late stage capitalism, the symptom is a mad dash to trade our natural resources for energy and pollution. The mad dash will continue as long as we’re bleeding humanity to keep the shareholders high and dry.

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Isn’t the largest data center currently something like 100MW? So “only” 0.1GW…65.000 space heaters is still insane though.

        • Einskjaldi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          You can have a complex of multiples though and they to congregate near each other for short interconnection.

        • expatriado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          we were asked 400MW for a new data center, we told them 100MW is the max we could provide for now, and increase later, we have a new natural gas plant soon to enter operation to replace two retiring coal plants, but looks like we’re postponing decommission targets to keep demand

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I’ve had a pretty longstanding belief that a lot of the AI push is to inflate energy demand, as we increasingly add more renewables. In order to keep dirty energy “creating revenue” we need an energy sink to offset any added energy. I think this was crypto, and then NFTs. Those both faded away as soon as the AI stuff started being pushed. I don’t believe this is totally a coincidence.

          • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I mean, it’s a bit disingenuous to use a GW example in relation to the article, when the largest currently in operation is 0.15GW

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Oh. I originally put megawatt and thought that was too small so I just incremented the metric exponent.

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      There’s 33kWh worth of energy in a gallon of gasoline, and they use 0.3gal/hour when idling, so cars are pumping out 11kWh of heat just sitting there…that’s a surprisingly large amount of heat.

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        18 hours ago

        33 kWh/gallon * 0.3 gallon/h = 10 kWh/h = 10 kW

        But units aside, that is really nothing. The car itself already has about 3 m² area or about 3 kW of sunlight. The issue is the CO2 (globally) and pollution from the car (locally, causing smog etc.).

        • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I rounded a bit (before I miscalculated), there’s 33.7kWh in a gallon and they use 0.35gal/h on average, so they actually use 11.8kWh just idling

  • LumpyPancakes@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Would be nice if they built them in cold climates and piped the heat to houses and buildings like the steam era of old.

  • NoTagBacks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I’m not sure what you guys are worried about. All that extra heat will just dissipate into the atmosphere and eventually radiate into space. It’s not like there’s anything in the atmosphere that would interfere with this cycle… right?

  • Bitflip@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Its not enough. Donate fire to a nearby data center today to improve its temperature!

      • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Make a drone that can land on the roof, drop some thermite to melt a hole down into the data center, then have it lower a small EMP device into the hole and fry their whole system.