I can’t. I just can’t.

  • thoro@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    37 minutes ago

    They will really do anything before investing in public transit

  • Eddbopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    43 minutes ago

    Why is the government over reaching it’s authority. I want less government not more

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’d recommend a 1995 Toyota, Nissan or Mitsubishi rather than a Ford 😅

      • this_1_is_mine@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I don’t see any 95 Toyota’s Honda’s Mitsubishi or Nissan but I do see a lot of 95 Fords. I’ll go with what I can find

      • BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Toyota did it lazily in my '21 Rav4, just pull the fuse for the modem and it doesn’t care. Just don’t let a dealer plug into the system in case that data can still be downloaded physically

      • FUsername@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        I think, you better can buy cars without will that fancy shit and add features by aftermarket devices than doing it any using all that closed eco system crap from the manufacturer.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    My car is constantly telling me to drive with both hands or yo get coffee when I am driving fine.

    Many years ago I had a somewhat scary car accident and since I drive very cautiously and never speed. Yet this fucking thing is still yelling at me all the time.

    If I could figure out how it decides to yell at me, I would unplug it.

        • HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah the beeps and bongs are not a new thing. Clarkson raged about it 20+ years ago. “I KNOW THE DOOR IS OPEN THERES A HUGE GAP NEXT TO ME”

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 hours ago

            No, that’s not even close to how bad it is now. Hell, I bought a car that’s a decade old and the fucker yells at me for being to close to the lines, yells if I’m approaching a stopped car “too fast” (which means it freaks out even when I’m slowing past 25 with 4-5 SUV lengths ahead of me), when I back up and there’s anything remotely close off to the side (remotely close is the 2.5 ft on either side of me as I back out my driveway), and it gives me an extra special freak out if there’s any possible cross traffic to 4 houses on either side of me. That last one is a nice warning the few times I’ve needed it, but more often than not, it’s spazzing out over the neighbors taking their dog out on the other side of the street.

            • [deleted]@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I have a 2023 and while it does those things by default every single one of them can be turned off.

              The front collision and the movement behind were left on because they occasionally help. Lane assist and the proximity got turned off immediately because of so many false alarms.

            • HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Yeah I didn’t mean to say that its been that bad forever. Its gotten worse in the last 10-15 years. But it started ages ago, back in the ancient times. I remember my 1987 Volkswagen had a buzzer if I had lights on when the ignition was off. That was a good thing to have tbh, especially back then. But now you get a warning bong just because you have a kilogram of apples on the back seat.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Many cars that can tell that, senses wether or not you give any resistance whenever it corrects the lane position. If it doesn’t feel any resistance, it’ll assume you’re not actually holding the steering wheel. Try keeping a firmer grip of the wheel.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I have to admit to developing the habit of wiggling the steering wheel regularly. Unfortunately that doesn’t help for camera based systems

    • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Because late stage capitalism, lobbyists pushed legislators to allow data collection so that it can be sold to insurance companies who also lobbied so that they can charge more for premiums.

      Every company makes more profit.

      We don’t live in a democracy anymore.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Not suddenly. It’s been going on at least as far back as 2001. Probably more. It’s generally not the gov’t either as the gov’t is mostly driven by moneyed private interests like large corporations. They always push in different ways to get more power to make profit. Get rid of a regulation, make new regulation, get a subsidy, limit rights to resist some abuse, etc. Sometimes it’s just more obvious that others in general, or it’s in an are we personally pay attention to, and we’re like WTAF.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    https://futurism.com/the-byte/camera-cars-detects-drinking

    A team of Australian scientists have cooked up a new AI-driven camera system that can detect whether you are too drunk to drive a vehicle.

    But the project isn’t quite ready for wide use with only 75 percent accuracy, according to the researchers out of Edith Cowan University in Western Australia, who had presented this camera project at a computer vision conference earlier this year.

    Should be interesting.

    • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I assume the system is working properly and 25% of drivers just drive as erratically sober as the other 75% blind drunk.

      And that’s among the ones who managed to get to the study. The percentage would be higher if it took into account the ones who got lost or crashed on the way.

      • GarboDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If that was true should be rolled out as that’s about the same thing. Those people shouldn’t drive / should go/back to driving school

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      with only 75 percent accuracy

      Unless they’re telling you the Type 1 and Type 2 error rates, they’re not worth a shit.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 hours ago

    What the fuck? When did Congress pass this, and why wasn’t there a huge public outcry against it?

  • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 hours ago

    So how much is this tech going to raise already stupidly high car prices.

      • quack@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        That thing is so ugly that it almost loops back around into looking cool again

        • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          34 minutes ago

          With those huge ass flared arches, I cannot help but wonder how fast it’d go with a different motor and power management.

          Or just with a reflash and acceptance that the 80hp motor will be dead in 15000km

          Its a throwback design based on the o.g 2cv, and its friend-shaped. And 15k. Its dope.

    • Limonene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 hours ago

      $100-$500 according to the article. No discount for the biometric data they’ll sell.

  • doc@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    14 hours ago

    And when all the used cars are gone and I’m forced to buy one of these I’ll promptly be destroying the radio transmitters and everything related to this surveillance.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      the “surveillance” seems to happen on the car locally. Kind of an expansion of current driver attention systems to include impairment detection.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        64
        ·
        13 hours ago

        “Local” surveillance happening on the same car computer that’s attached to a SIM card.

        Yeah seems safe

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          12 hours ago

          It’s local right until the law enforcement gets into Bluetooth range with the right encryption keys to download all of the data for the past year.

            • tal@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I remember when we discovered that militants in Afghanistan were monitoring Predator video feeds because apparently nobody had ever put in a requirement that the video stream be encrypted.

              https://www.networkworld.com/article/769321/insurgents-intercept-video-feeds-from-u-s-drones-using-26-software-report-says.html

              Militants in Iraq and Afghanistan have intercepted live video feeds from unmanned U.S. Predator drones using $26 off the shelf software made by a Russian company, says a report in the Wall Street Journal.

              • elephantium@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 hours ago

                IIRC that was because the Predator video feeds were intended to be viewed in-theatre by officers right there on the front, and military protocol around encryption keys would have made it so no one at the front would have been able to decrypt the feed.

                Considering they were designed in the early 90s, i.e. before public-key cryptography took off with SSL, that explanation always seemed plausible to me.