- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/38803374
I can’t. I just can’t.
“If the AI determines you’re impaired (blood alcohol ≥0.08% or showing fatigue), it can prevent ignition startup or limit vehicle speed”
So if I the driver is injured, or distraught over an injured passenger, the car will limit how fast they can get to a hospital?
Reckon this needs a little more time in the thinking through phase of the process.
yesterday on a police chase livestream on YouTube the cops tried to shut down a car that was running from them by calling the company. They got a spike strip before they could get it worked out but even hearing that it’s an option is absolutely dystopian
here’s the vod btw
https://www.youtube.com/live/-d9lHib8FJMis absolutely dystopian
Esp because they could already use, you know… a spike strip!
It feels kinda like targeted v dragnet surviilance debate. Targeted feels OK if you get a warrant from a judge, use the legal procedures. But dragnet makes for a dystopia. Similar here. I don’t want a global ability for some centralized db to flip a bit and stop any body’s car across the world. Or, worst case, hacked and stops EVERYBODYs car at once.
Already exist in Australia and these systems are total garbage that keep warning non stop.
This is so dystopian
It was game over for humanity decades ago.
The federal government promises this surveillance saves 9,000-10,000 lives annually.
What happens when it doesn’t. Is their a provision to end the program if it doesnt make certain targeted goals? No? Of course not! That would be data driven legislation.
the reasons i want to get a motorcycle just keep adding up. everything about cars keeps getting ruined
Dooo it! DRZ DRZ!
Modern are having our right of repair taken away to not just spyware.
1998 Toyota Carola for the win, easy to fix, and no spyware, and just works.





