Let’s hope it’s actually true.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    ffs, all I’m hearing is that they plan to fuck with it a lot in upcoming months, which can only be bad news

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Did y’all miss this past week where they disabled their flagship egg-basket for 1.5 billion people on purpose?

    Yeah they made Copilot chromium-browser only for about 5 days. On purpose. Or, the less charitable version is they just rolled out a bug that broke things for a massive amount of people, kept the news reports down, and waited a week before being convinced that was a Dumb As Fuck move.

    Everyone has to learn this in their own ways but tech people always get there eventually: microsoft is, and always has been, awful.

    It’s like learning HP printers are awful.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        I had an HP laser printer pre 2000, the thing was built like a tank and just always worked

  • el_muerte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    the sources claim that the Start menu is getting a full rewrite in WinUI 3, which will make it 60% more responsive

    Oh good, that’ll bring it all the way up to a third as responsive as the Windows 7 one was.

    • ken@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Let’s not forget that Win7 was almost 25% as responsive as Win2k3, which could even hold a candle to GNOME.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    the Start menu is getting a full rewrite in WinUI 3, which will make it 60% more responsive

    Uh. I think I found the issue. A menu isn’t even supposed to have various degrees of responsiveness.

    • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah. 60% more responsive for something infamous for taking multiple seconds to launch is depressingly bad. That’s “not even trying” levels of improvement.

      The start menu should open essentially instantly (excluding optional animations) – 100 ms is good, 200 ms is somewhat adequate. They’re aiming for somewhere between 400 and 1200 ms.

      I hope for them that they underpromise and overdeliver because this does not inspire confidence.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 hours ago

        For a menu to take longer than 200ms is ridiculous. At 500ms of wait for my menu to show, the OS is getting nuked.

        As for the ‘inspire confidence’,when was the last time MS inspired anything that was not disgust? Excluding the C-suite and some investors, of course.

        • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Some of the newer C# features are nice. Of course .Net is not handled by the same people who keep setting Windows on fire.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    User: the updates keep breaking my system, I see AI and ads everywhere and stupid electron apps use all my RAM

    MS execs: I know! Let’s rewrite the start menu again!

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 hours ago

      To be fair, using react for it was just an odd decision to begin with.

      • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, React Native exists basically for the sole purpose of making things multiplatform easily. A menu that’s specifically made for one operating system is only getting the downsides.

  • Solaris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Say what you want about Microsoft, but at the very least, it seems to know when it needs to change course.

    That has to be sarcasm, right?

  • Monument@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    12 hours ago

    For one, the sources claim that the Start menu is getting a full rewrite in WinUI 3, which will make it 60% more responsive and notably more customizable.

    Customizable for whom?
    Users? Advertisers?

    • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Windows users will be soon, for the first time ever, able to put the task bar on any edge of the screen, imagine that for customization.

  • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    18 hours ago

    That’s what they said a month ago, then they decided that ‘remove copilot from notepad’ meant ‘rename copilot in notepad’.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I remember reading that plan and being shocked about how good it sounded. And then they did the exact opposite of every single thing they promised, which I’m sure endeared themselves to all their enterprise customers.

      So sure, I welcome Microsoft’s attempts to finally drag itself back into relevancy, but they’ve got a massive self-inflicted foot wound that’s gonna complicate matters.