• velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    Turns out when you allow sex-selective abortions and inflate the importance of men above women, there’s more men in the population and more competition for being able to procreate.

    TLDR There’s too many men around.

    • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s so fucking made up. Every part of that sentence is made up.

      Here is actual information: "This is what the World Health Organization (WHO) considers the “expected sex ratio at birth”, which means that, in the absence of gender discrimination or interference, it’s expected that there would be around 105 boys born per 100 girls — although this can range from around 103 to 107 boys per 100 girls.”

      https://ourworldindata.org/gender-ratio

      The world ratio at birth is 105.2 which almost exactly the expected “no gender discrimination range”

      Sure some countries have SOME effect caused by gender discrimination, but gender discrimination before birth is in no way a globally significant contributor to excess males at birth.

      • velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If you read the article and the study it references, selective sex abortion has affected these numbers.

        Its not the only reason, but this is also not my only comment about it here.

        • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Sure, it’s a contributor, everything is a contributor. But the main thing is that young men aren’t dying like they used to in the past. That’s the primary mechanism skewing gender fertility ratios. Sex selective abortions are relevant in some countries to some extent, but globally are almost nothing. It’s a red herring.

          When you have 5 extra boys born for every 100 girls the default position is there are more reproductive aged men than women. The fact we haven’t had that has been because young boys and men disproportionately died compared to young girls and women globally. Modern medicine, laws, and general peace in most of the world has stopped that trend.

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Where’s your data suggesting that sex-selective abortions have resulted in less women being born in the U.S.? Cuz the last time I checked, which was admittedly quite some time ago so I’m not sure about the numbers now, most abortions in the U.S. happen before the point where you can determine a babies gender.