• doodledup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s in their best interest to suppress non-human conversations. What are you talking about?

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is it? Reddit has been full of bots for years.

      And if the r/CMV thing didn’t make it apparently, the recent wave of them weren’t “caught in the act” and only became a “problem” when the researchers announced their shitty experiment.

      If realistic chat bots can fool the masses, why on earth would reddit get rid of them? It helps their metrics. “Look at how active our site is! Buy stock!”

      • doodledup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I know you enjoy hating on Reddit but what you’re saying doesn’t make any sense. Reddit is an advertising business. Bots don’t view advertising but adds infrastructure cost. Additionally, humans are way better at engagement with the platform and people than bots.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 day ago

          Bot activity brings “engagement” which generated more page views from actual humans. Literally the only downside of this announcement is the optics of having bots in the first place.

          The bots were already indistinguishable from humans on reddit, do you really think that this recent scrutiny is going to lead to fewer bots? Or might it actually lead to better bots?

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Additionally additionally, as it says in the article, reddit sells its content to OpenAI, and in order to do that, they need it to be organic. If you feed AI output back info AI, it makes the output worse, not better. So, there’s another financial incentive to ensure that the people talking on reddit are actually human.

          • atrielienz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            I would like to remind you of two things. The first is that reddit used to have a mod tool called “BotDefense”. It’s shutdown in July of 2023 directly lead to a major uptick in Spam Bots.

            The second is that part of the ad revenue is “impressions”. Impressions are just an account (bot or human) “viewing” the ad and they do not require a click-through. The platform hosting the ad still gets paid for those.

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            If openai kept buying reddit data after 2022, they are idiots. They let the cat out of the bag.

    • Merva@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Where on Earth have you gotten that bizarre idea? It is in their interest to promote engagement, human or not, by any means necessary.

    • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      No it isn’t and they have openly talked about doing this practice back in the early days of reddit to make the site appear more active than it really was. Nothing has changed.