• DdCno1@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    There’s a reason I contrasted the West-German with the East-German situation. One was clearly an occupation, the other was a lot more nuanced. Perhaps I should have elaborated on just how independent the West-German government was in its decision making even before 1955. This kind of behavior simply isn’t possible under anything that can be described as an occupation.

    I didn’t say figuring out, I said figuring. Presented with two choices, close everything down or pay rent, they chose the latter.

    Alright, fair enough.

    • Muehe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      This kind of behavior simply isn’t possible under anything that can be described as an occupation.

      Well if its still a de jure occupation, by virtue of other countries having rights over the subject country, I think that alone already makes it fair to still call it an occupation. If the occupying powers furthermore do in fact still have active military deployments in the country I am beginning to wonder how you could not call it a military occupation.