Yes, this is official documentation from the MS Learn course for the Agentic AI Solution Architect certificate
Microslop SharePhont™
The worst is claiming Copilot “understands intent & meaning”, the funny mistakes more or less show that that’s just a blatant lie.
Data flow
Data flow Data flow
Data flow
A “combingent” is when a guy is going commando, but when using the bathroom, is in too much of a hurry and gets his scrote skin caught in the zip
I’m starting to think they aren’t concerned about making their slides even remotely veritable. This one’s barely even combigent!
Those are perfectly cromulent words.
I started using linkwarden to archive their documentation for various things just so I know I’m not crazy when it changes.
You can track the changes on its github https://github.com/microsoftdocs
Understands intent & meaning Understands intent & meaning Understands intent & meaning Understands intent & meaning Understands intent & meaning Understands intent & meaning
It’s Microslop. The people who had any resemblance of work ethics left a long time ago. No one still working there gives any shits about QA - especially not the management.
This is not AI, AI would have made it much better. I mean, the only thing LLMs are quite good at is writing words, it is uncommon they misspell a word.
LLMs misspell words in generated images. Modern models aren’t as bad as they were a year or two ago, but we don’t know what model was used here.
I thought it wasn’t in English at first.
Due to the negative press combigent
Veritable answer? Indubitably!
Saw this article from Microslop the other day about their MDASH copilot model competing with Mythos for bug finding/fixing.
And here’s the image they went with for the flowchart of what the AI does… Complete with overlapping text and the worst layout I’ve ever seen.
Zero humans proofed this.
about their MDASH copilot model
that’s satire, right?
I know this! This is a slide deck which only makes sense in an interactive way, where the steps are revealed after one another. Probably straight from a presentation.
Don’t attribute bad work to AI which can be done in the same way by an incompetent human.
As someone who’s career depended on presentations for a while:
Never build animations in-slide (unless they are purely aesthetic).
Instead:
Build multiple slides which duplicate the previous and add new boxes with transitions on the slides. Bonus: change the title on each build to cover the key point.
Sure, they take longer to edit. But that leave-behind export to PDF always works.
Data Flow
Data Flow
Data Flow
The Data must Flow
(Patric Laine)
It’s the Combigent Directive
You missed “Microsoft 36S” and “Intemal Docs”
Yeah those are very weird errors. Not like AI hallucinations. But more like OCR errors.
I wonder if they imported another PowerPoint and then the AI made images out of it to process it. That would be a very inefficient way to do it.
Maybe the AI has had an OCR pass grafted onto its output processing to make it seem more capable of producing text. AI image generation usually makes weird alien looking text, I could imagine someone deciding to add on an automatic cleanup step to try to make it less obviously AI.
