• Proton VPN has hit back at Canada’s proposed Bill C-22

• The proposed legislation could require VPNs to log user metadata

• NordVPN and Windscribe have also slammed the bill

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh pray tell how so? Because proton not only accepts people on blacklists as deserving to be there with no way to appeal, despite you know, things. But they also removed like thousands of people that the US government said they were suspicious of they sent them a list and they suspended all their email accounts, no appeal nothing. Based on the word of the United States government, a famously untrustworthy source. I say that as United States citizen.

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Because proton not only accepts people on blacklists as deserving to be there with no way to appeal, despite you know, things

          You’re going to have to elaborate or rephrase this because I have no idea what you’re trying to say here

          they also removed like thousands of people that the US government said they were suspicious of they sent them a list and they suspended all their email accounts, no appeal nothing. Based on the word of the United States government, a famously untrustworthy source. I say that as United States citizen.

          No they didn’t.

          • bedwyr@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            First of all the second part was in the news just like 6 9 months ago, I might not have an entirely right but that’s generally what they did, they took the word off governments over people. Second of all I happen to know they accept blacklists as trustworthy, I know because someone who isn’t me is on one and they refused them an account.

            In truth they are Israel’s bitch. In short.

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I might not have an entirely right but that’s generally what they did, they took the word off governments over people

              No they didn’t. Thats not “generally” what they did at all. You’re just spreading more misinformation that you admittedly aren’t even very confident about.

              Second of all I happen to know they accept blacklists as trustworthy, I know because someone who isn’t me is on one and they refused them an account.

              Do you have any proof of this? Or are you just going with “I heard from a guy”?

            • XLE@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Is it this, or something else?

              https://theintercept.com/2025/09/12/proton-mail-journalist-accounts-suspended/

              I’ve been following this on X/Twitter and I think one of the most egregious things that’s important to point out is that folks from Phrack reached out to Proton in private multiple times, and Proton ghosted them. Proton only engaged with them and then reinstated the accounts after Phrack went public and their X/Twitter post went viral. It also looks like one of the writers filed an appeal with Proton and Proton denied the appeal, so they manually investigated the incident and refused to reinstate the account and then only did after this got attention on X/Twitter.

              https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45227316

              • XLE@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                13 hours ago

                @Photonic@lemmy.world @mabeledo@lemmy.world @EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world I’m glad you took the time to look at my post, but why did you dislike it? Did the new information offend you in some way?

                • mabeledo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  Because it’s dumb.

                  Proton then stated that they “stand with journalists” but “cannot see the content of accounts and therefore cannot always know when anti-abuse measures may inadvertently affect legitimate activism.”

                  Every legitimate email service has anti abuse policies in place. The alternative is letting the service be turned into a bot farming operation, or worse.

                  Still waiting for your recommended alternatives.

                • Photonic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 hours ago

                  It’s just incredibly stupid and short-sighted.

                  Edit: also, how are you tracking your downvotes? Serious question.

                • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  You were trying to help out that other misinformation bot find the made up event he was talking about and you couldn’t. I downvoted it because that’s what you’re supposed to do with unhelpful information.

                  • XLE@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    9 hours ago

                    The information I provided was true. Why are you lying about it?

              • bedwyr@piefed.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                I do read The Intercept but that article is not what I’m talking about, there’s something else that was a lot worse than that that they did just last year. Someone who isn’t me signed up for an account and it’s totally legit and was denied because they’re on a blacklist because Israel and there was no way to like appeal on proton.

                • XLE@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I’d love to see that article if you can find it. I’ll add it to a folder’s worth of bookmarks that is growing larger than it should.

                  • bedwyr@piefed.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    I was just saying my comment that while I do read that publication what I’m talking about is a direct experience of someone who is not me.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          2 days ago

          Because, for some reason on Lemmy, people think Proton is above criticism, and will defend the corporation’s false claims of fighting for their users when we have article after article proving the opposite

          • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            They’re not at all above criticism. The thing is all we have in the way of criticism is article after article of misinformation born from either technical ignorance or deliberate misrepresentation of the facts. None of which stand up to a moments scrutiny, much less “prove” anything.

            On the more innocent side of the scale, you’ll have people chastising Proton over negatives that are entirely out of their control, and exist because they have to when operating as a public email provider. Then those same people will point people to alternatives like Fastmail or Tutanota that have all the same problems, but are less transparent about it.

            Like if you want to make an argument against public email providers as a whole you can surely do so, but so far there’s really no evidence that Proton is anything but as good as you are reasonably going to get if you do decide to use one.

            • XLE@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 day ago

              all we have in the way of criticism is article after article of misinformation

              Ironic you made misinformation to claim this. It’s a strawman. Anyway

              negatives that are entirely out of their control

              No, it’s their false advertisement that claims it is within their control.

              • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Ironic you made misinformation to claim this. It’s a strawman. Anyway

                I didn’t make any misinformation. Nor is there a strawman. If you think there is “article after article” of proof then feel free to provide a couple.

                No, it’s their false advertisement that claims it is within their control.

                Like what exactly?

                • XLE@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I didn’t make any misinformation. Nor is there a strawman

                  You claimed there was misinformation. Show us where you think it is. Don’t be a hypocrite.

                  • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    You claimed there is article after article of proof. Go ahead and share it with us. You can’t just uno-reverse the burden of proof for your claim to me lol.

                    There is plenty of misinformation in this thread alone. Like this comment here

                    Which consists of a completely fabricated story about Proton with no evidence that it happened, and some anecdote the OP heard from somebody else with no verification whatsoever.

          • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’d like to see those “articles over articles” that do not reference the one case that is cited over and over please.

            • XLE@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              You already educated everybody here that Proton is not to be trusted when it comes to logging. What do I get out of talking to you further, my anarchist friend? If you see a couple more articles, will you make a post condemning Proton’s false advertisement?

              • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                I’m more of a socialist than an anarchist, although i sympathize with anarchists - socialism and anarchism can have quite some overlap.

                Any you really should work on your reading skills, because what i wrote and what you want to understand are two very different things. Since they don’t log IPs when not court ordered, no court can retroactively extract that data, and to be honest, if you know that you might attract government attention, using Tor or a VPN (yes, even ProtonVPN would have sufficed in this case) is basic OpSec - both would have prevented actionable intel being logged.

                • XLE@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  You sound like you would be absolutely outraged if you found out Proton marketed itself towards activists. Have you looked at the promises on their homepage recently?