• cecilkorik@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 days ago

    I boot off an SSD and besides intentional delays like waiting to see if I want to pick a different kernel, it only takes a handful of seconds. I don’t really see the issue, but it’s a good cause and best of luck I guess.

    • testaccount372920@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s basically what the article states. Most users have fast enough systems to not bother with this tool, but embedded systems and other slow hardware could benefit from this. I imagine it’s mostly useful for engineers (and smart home hobbyists) to optimize processes or product lines.

    • HelloRoot@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      5 seconds? How?

      My grub is set to 2sec.

      From pressing the power on button to an open start menu (I measure like this because the DE is still unusable for a good 5s after it becomes visible) it takes me about 36 seconds.

      I recently tried hibernation thinking it would speed things up, but it takes about 2 minutes… huge RAM bad I guess.

      (And yes, windows on the same hardware is way faster at about 17s, because it does some magic idk about)

      • Redjard@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hibernation shouldn’t take long unless you actually have a lot in ram. It won’t write empty ram, it’s really more like swapping out all pages.

        Maybe your ssd is just slow? Some motherboards also take their sweet time.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Windows has had a “fast startup” thing for a while where it hibernates just some parts of the OS.

        I used to always disable it because I’ve run into situations where having it off prevented issues that appeared with it on.

        Fortunately I don’t have to use any Windows machines on a regular basis now, so it doesn’t matter.

    • brian@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      if you’re looking for something for desktop, systemd-analyze is quite nice. no automated fixes, but helps with finding the problems (biggest wins for me are normally things like waiting on secondary drives, or units waiting on network when they don’t need it, etc). the arch wiki page has some general advice

      • beutlin@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Doch, genau so sollte das sein. Symmetrische Ciphers sind schnell, richtig, aber sie sind natürlich langsamer als “gar nichts”. Dementsprechend schon sinnvoll, dass das die Bootzeit verlängert.

        Und dann natürlich auch immer eine Frage des Setups. Encrypted root+boot brauchen dann bspw bereits im Grub support für die Verschlüsselung und Grub nimmt sich dafür tendenziell mehr Zeit.

      • Redjard@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Maybe they’re counting time to type in a password. That’s what it comes down to for me, in my boottime graph. Hugely bloated initramfs times dominating everything cause I took human timescales to input 60 characters.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        So wie ichs verstehe ist Argon2 absichtlich “langsam” um bruteforce Angriffe zu erschweren. Auf meinem 5800X3D brauchts nur ~2 Sekunden aber auf nem Thinkpad mit deutlich weniger compute sind das eher so 10 Sekunden.

  • LaMouette@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Bazzite take a very long time to load on a 16gb ram core i7 laptop i have. Something like 30s at least. So I’d take any advice to improve that

      • LaMouette@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ok I fully understand your point of view but I have small people living with me telling me hurtful things like that windows is better because it starts faster (then proceed to play minecraft without any issue on linux)

      • KaRunChiy@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        People downvote but i remember when my pc would take 5 to 10 minutes to boot. 30 seconds isn’t very long, just turn it on, walk to another room, and it’s on by the time you’ve turned around and came back

    • Wiz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t like the idea of giving extra money to my douchebag power company when I don’t need to. Stupid mandated monopoly with mandated profit margin.

  • megopie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    in an era where many systems are always-on and suspend/resume working more reliably these days

    … do people not turn their computers off when they’re done using them?

  • KaRunChiy@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    It takes my system 3 seconds to go from POST to a gui login, so uuhhh, what boot times

    • Peter Horvath@mastodon.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      @Evotech @cm0002 Systemd ist eine sch…e, es sagt parallel boot, aber es hat so viele unnötige interne Abhängigkeite, es ist praktisch single-threaded wie sysv. Runit is parallel, niemand nutzt es.