Henry Cuellar, Donald Davis, Cleo Fields, Laura Gillen, Vicente Gonzalez, Marcy Kaptur, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, and Eugene Vindman

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Maybe you should look it up then. Because, if you answer it for them, it’s not really rhetorical, is it?

          • zoloftt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            I think you missed the part where I framed it as if I was having a conversation with the person? You’re clearly angry about my choice of literary devices. Sorry to upset you.

            Have a nice day.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              No, that part was very apparent. You having a make believe conversation where you spoke for the other person is the source of our entire conversation. It’s not a literary device, though, is the problem.

              Also, as long as we’re talking about literary devices immediately trying to frame anyone who disagrees with you as “angry” is a classic. Not a device from any respectable literature though of course.