Chat Control is not dead. The EU (still) wants to scan your private messages and photos

The “Chat Control” proposal would legalise scanning of all private digital communications, including encrypted messages and photos. This threatens fundamental privacy rights and digital security for all EU citizens.

  • Lantsu@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    They will push until it eventually goes through. I’m in the tinfoily prepation mode, better get a head start than act surprised in a few years when this finally passes.

      • Lantsu@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nokia prepaid dumbphone as my main, not any fancy remade stuff but a really old brick with new battery. I’m hoarding DVD’s, games, music and books. Making my own digital copies of them. Learning to use all the services the local library provides. Slowly building a new Linux PC that will eventually be turned into an offline DVD-player that runs basic games. (I can then do banking and such at the library PC or in the actual bank.)

        You don’t need to play along, but you can if you choose to.

        • EvasiveSpecies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m not very knowledgable about technology but ever since all of this + the push of ID verification online around the globe I’ve started to grow a small analog collection of games/books/DVDs. It’s the easiest way to prepare oneself for worst case scenarios even if one doesn’t know every detail.

          • Lantsu@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Absolutely! It brings peace of mind. And here used CDs and DVD’s cost around 1-2€ per piece so when the streaming services just keep deleting their content and jacking up the prices at the same time, it feels whole lot better and saves money in the long run. It’s fun to exchange movies with the friends too! Or to bring a physical disc to a movie night.

            I have bought a few boardgames too to play with the family and friends. It something I have just thought that “it could be fun” but never have gotten around to or actually bothered to play… Now I have gotten around and bothered and it has been a lot of fun!

        • zemo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          But a dumbphone surely has no encryption. Texts and calls over GSM can be readily read by the carrier and government. You would have to be extremely diligent not to slip any information that would identify you, but even if you dont you are still creating an alternate persona for data gathering entities.

          • Lantsu@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            So? You think I say or write anything important on the phone? Why would anyone? It’s for “on the way honey” or “honey do we need more beer?” kinda communication. For proper communication I write letters, emails or meet in person. Phones are the most suckiest way of communication.

  • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m completely pro chat control. To make it more accepted, we just need to show that it’s a good idea and lead by example! That’s why I propose, to completely publish all communications of our politicians and those that they communicate with. This content trove will be reviewed with AI* to make sure that there are no bad guys hiding in the government, right? As always, if they have nothing to hide, they have nothing to fear!

    * AI - Audience Interest: every one of us is free to analyze everything and publish and discuss their findings publicly.

    /s?

    • Akasazh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yup keep going guys it’s not going to get easier but fighting for your freedoms and principles is important.

      Just look at what apathy gets you as an alternative. Just rejoice in the fact that you have access to lawmakers and you can influence the process by being active.

      It seems like shit but one we give in then it will pass.

      Write to your mps sign some petitions, it seems like a chore but store then you care.

      • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Gorram, seemed nearby. There needs to be protection against lobbyists (could stop here) pushing the same crap that got shot down already, again and again. Throwing shit against the wall to see what sticks is for bluesky development, not governance.

    • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      For a few, true freedom requires the enslavement of many.

      The liberal democratic experiments are dying at the hands of their own owners. Turns out History didn’t end.

  • alakey@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    2 days ago

    I really wish there was some sort of rule that stated that if your proposal failed it gets blacklisted for the next 10 years, regardless of the framing of the proposal.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The Epstein class, that is causing the world to collapse, is also behind chat control and age verification.

      They’re gunning for totalitarian dictatorship.

    • DdCno1@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      The more unstable the world becomes, the more frequent and aggressive moves towards authoritarianism will be.

  • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    What was the method again to ensure that undead vampires do not leave their grave after their burial? Seems a little ritual needs to be added to the proceedings…

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They will make it illegal, or they will force mandatory backdoors into it. It will be hacked within days, and they will blame “left wing extremism.”

    • mimavox@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Probably mandatory scanning on device before encryption. Will destroy all privacy focused apps.

      • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        In this case, privacy-focused apps would just not implement it, as it’s the voluntary chat control “1.0” which we already had before. Of course, it would probably be used to eventually have another go at the mandatory scanning again.

        • gopher@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Yes, I’m a bit less worried about chat control “1.0” as it at least still allows one to choose services that don’t participate (I seem to recall reading somewhere that no encrypted services actually reported anything under 1.0 but have no source for it). Of course it is still not good.

          Biggest problem is that they are also discussing chat control 2.0 that would force privacy focussed apps to basically shut down or comply.

          • floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            You’ll only have privacy if everyone you talk to also uses a private server and a noncompliant client app that’s relatively hard to get. The chances are that your carefully encrypted texts just get scooped up after decryption at the other end. And if they get it built into mobile OSs so that apps can’t bypass it, even that won’t work.

          • mimavox@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I guess the only solution then would be to set up your own server with Nextcloud, Matrix etc.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The easiest would be to let the OS grab the keys of every connection and transmit them to the government.

      For everybody with their own OS, they can use the backdoors on the chips to get the keys.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Or just make life unpleasant for you because you use a different OS, maybe by adding you to a terrorism list.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    This kinda shit makes me glad we left. Then I look at our own government, it’s just as bad!

    • Noja@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sorry but the UK is still like 10x worse even if Chat Control would pass.

      • DdCno1@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yeah, the UK adopted 1984 as an instruction manual ages ago. I last visited it almost 20 years ago, but even then, the level of public surveillance alone was already ridiculous.