• scops@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      5 小时前

      Imagine paying for ads…

      This is one of those headlines for a problem I had no idea existed

        • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 分钟前

          TV ads are acceptable, they are strictly limited to -24 LUFS. Streaming media like YouTube enforces -14 LUFS.

          That’s 10 decibels, it’s twice as loud.

          And that’s just the hard cutoff.
          While YouTube will bring down the volume automatically (say, if you upload something with -9 LUFS, it will bring it down to -14), it doesn’t scale up.
          So maybe a conscious creator is uploading at -24, then BOOM ad at -14 and your ears start to bleed.

          This law aims to fix that, by forcing the ads to be at the same volume of the content that’s playing, instead of just being able to blast at full volume.

      • toddestan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 小时前

        I still don’t get the people who say they are going to watch the Super Bowl for the ads, then the day after the game they’re bitching about how terrible the ads were.

        I’m like… yeah… they are ads…

        Admittedly back in the .com days there were some good ones.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 小时前

        I miss when ads were fun and you’d watch the superbowl to see the new California raisins animation and Michael Jackson video.

        Smooth Criminal was amazing the first time it aired. Still great, but the long video blew us away.