These are what’s called stock photos. Photographers take thousands of these and sell them to companies to use in ads and other media.
They look real to me? Pattern matches up between the two flower dresses, no extra limbs, “tiny baby” legibly written on the one outfit but small enough that I don’t think that text could be generated without getting wonky. I don’t see any of the telltale signs and imho doesn’t even have the uncanny valley feeling to it.
Other comment says weird hand positions, but nothing looks out of the ordinary for a kid
This looks completely normal to me, nothing about this appears to be AI.
I just found out shows like 90 Day Fiance have been playing AI music for years so nothing would surprise me
Look at the hands.
Looks wonky enough for me to believe they’re fakes.
Not trying to be mean, but when’s the last time you spent any time with a kid around that age? My toddler is doing things along those lines with her hands in every picture I have of her.
Good catch!
Column 2, row 4. Left hand (from our perspective) has 4 fingers, right hand has 6 fingers (notice the lifted one behind the flower)
People have gone so far down the rabbit hole of trying to assert pictures are AI, theyve started false flagging normal pictures.
For the above pic, her right thumb is obviously just down… obviously holding the plant in her hand.
Her left hand is normal, thats her arm behind the flower you mis-identified as a finger.
I think the one behind the flower is the armpit. The thumb on the other hand might be holding the stem on he other side of he index finger. That said, that seems to be a weird extra strip of clothing on the hand behind the flower
You mean the other flowers?
