The agreement 🤝 also included dividing Europe into spheres of influence. Which makes the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact the only agreement on that list not between two axis powers that can be morally condemned without the benefit of hindsight.
Yes. Finland wouldn’t have sided with the Nazis had Stalin not attacked them. Even more, the Soviet invasion of Finland shows that Stalin felt he could trust Hitler to honor the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact. Stalin trusted only one person in the whole world, and that was Hitler. Almost like a tragic love story, if they weren’t both credible contenders for the title of “Worst Human in History”.
After having a secret pact with Hitler to split Europe. For countries like Poland the WW2 occupation didn’t end until 1989, because USSR “saved us Nazis” by imposing their own regime.
The reason why Russia doesn’t even recognize WW2 and call it The Great Patriotic War that started in 1942 is exactly because Stalin worked with Nazis through Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and Hitler backstabbed Stalin via Operation Barbarossa.
And Poland signed a pact with the Nazis to carve up Czechoslovakia, so fuck’em. They were also occupying part of Ukraine and still cry about the Soviets taking it back
This is completely ahistorical. The entire reason Stalin signed the treaty is because he knew Hitler would attack the USSR eventually, and they needed time to prepare and also didn’t want to fight a war on two fronts (because the red army was busy saving China from the Japanese).
You have poor reading comprehension. I thought you guys loved reading books.
Anyway, my entire comment was about how Stalin trusted Hitler so much that he let Barbarossa unfold as a surprise attack. Everything I wrote dealt specifically with that. FlyingCircus ignored what I wrote and went off on a tangent about the alliance in general.
I said nothing about why Stalin allied with Hitler. I want to know why he took Hitler his word, refused to station defensive troops, disbelieved his own intelligence agencies, and executed German communists who gave their lives to warn the USSR about the imminent invasion.
His only choice was to sign a treaty with Hitler, because Britain and France refused to become allies with Stalin. Britain and France thought it best to let the communists and fascists fight it out and hopefully destroy each other.
Stalin signed a non aggression pact and then began rapidly industrializing his country, knowing dman well that Hitler would eventually break the treaty.
It’s very fucking telling how mad you people get that Stalin didn’t let Hitler have all of Poland. Literally whining that the holocaust wasn’t even worse.
Particularly monstrous when you remember most of that territory was just Ukrainian under polish occupation
If you’re an ahistorical imperial propaganda enjoyer, sure, I guess?
Double genocide theory is literal fascist propaganda, which even has its own Wikipedia page, lmao.
a term used to refer to the claim that the atrocities committed by the Soviet Union against Eastern Europeans constitute a genocide that was equivalent in scale and nature to the Holocaust, in which approximately six million Jews were systematically murdered by Nazi Germany. The theory first gained popularity in Lithuania after the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991
Scholars have criticized the double genocide theory as a form of Holocaust trivialization.
And you’re saying that that excess mortality is the same as the systematic genocide of over 10 million people by Nazi Germany? That makes you a Nazi apologist and a holocost trivializer. Very lib of you, lol.
Lmao. To know someone as stupid as you thinks I’m a moron makes me immensely proud. Re read that double genocide theory page and understand that you are repeating literal historically documented fascist propaganda.
By “divvy up Poland”, you mean “soviet land that Poland took in the early 1920s”, I’m sure.
Your knowledge of history seems entirely non existent, besides “enemies of my capitalist imperialist genocidal empire are bad and have always been bad, despite literally saving the world from the Nazis”
The Central Committee of the Russian Communist Party is confident that the Kuomintang will hold high the banner of Sun Yat-sen in the great struggle for liberation from imperialism, that the Kuomintang will succeed with honour in carrying this banner to complete victory over imperialism and its agents in China.
It is said that the Chinese Communists should withdraw from the Kuomintang. That would be wrong, comrades. The withdrawal of the Chinese Communists from the Kuomintang at the present time would be a profound mistake
What I’m seeing here is that the USSR as a whole decided to make it their official position to advise against Chinese communists giving up on the effort to co-opt the Kuomintang as a movement/organization, and you’re saying that somehow equates to Joseph Stalin personally doing harm to the Chinese communist revolution. I can’t think of anything I could possibly say to discredit you that would do a better job than this, thank you.
Stalin saved europe from the Nazis, lol.
Removed by mod
Nonaggression pact is not an alliance
He was never an ally to Nazis. That’s ahistorical. He signed a non aggression pact, just like all the rest of the powers at the time.
And he was the last one to do it, because he was begging the UK and France for an alliance against Germany.
The agreement 🤝 also included dividing Europe into spheres of influence. Which makes the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact the only agreement on that list not between two axis powers that can be morally condemned without the benefit of hindsight.
You have no idea what was in any of the other pacts lol
You certainly don’t.
“No u!”? Wow, fucking good one.
If I were wrong, you’d show a counterexample.
Sounds like he would do anything to buy time to build up an army that would go on to defeat the Nazis.
Like wasting soldiers and ammunition to invade Finland, also giving the Nazis another ally in the process?
You’re blaming Finnish Nazis on Stalin lol?
Yes. Finland wouldn’t have sided with the Nazis had Stalin not attacked them. Even more, the Soviet invasion of Finland shows that Stalin felt he could trust Hitler to honor the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact. Stalin trusted only one person in the whole world, and that was Hitler. Almost like a tragic love story, if they weren’t both credible contenders for the title of “Worst Human in History”.
What a removed thing to say.
Removed by mod
And then?
Removed by mod
No I was getting at Stalin beating the Nazis and saving Europe from the Nazis lol.
Removed by mod
This is historical revisionism. WWII was started by Nazi Germany.
Never happened, try harder halfwit
deleted by creator
After having a secret pact with Hitler to split Europe. For countries like Poland the WW2 occupation didn’t end until 1989, because USSR “saved us Nazis” by imposing their own regime.
The reason why Russia doesn’t even recognize WW2 and call it The Great Patriotic War that started in 1942 is exactly because Stalin worked with Nazis through Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and Hitler backstabbed Stalin via Operation Barbarossa.
And Poland signed a pact with the Nazis to carve up Czechoslovakia, so fuck’em. They were also occupying part of Ukraine and still cry about the Soviets taking it back
And then Stalin defeated the Nazis, right?
With US equipment and waves and waves of Ukrainians.
Lol. The US barely helped at all in the grand scheme of the USSR VS the Nazis.
Removed by mod
Lmao, majority? You’re delusional.
Removed by mod
What a verbose load of bullshit, lol. Please write me another wall of text.
Removed by mod
This is completely ahistorical. The entire reason Stalin signed the treaty is because he knew Hitler would attack the USSR eventually, and they needed time to prepare and also didn’t want to fight a war on two fronts (because the red army was busy saving China from the Japanese).
You didn’t address anything I wrote.
They did, and also everything you wrote was fucking moronic
You have poor reading comprehension. I thought you guys loved reading books.
Anyway, my entire comment was about how Stalin trusted Hitler so much that he let Barbarossa unfold as a surprise attack. Everything I wrote dealt specifically with that. FlyingCircus ignored what I wrote and went off on a tangent about the alliance in general.
I said nothing about why Stalin allied with Hitler. I want to know why he took Hitler his word, refused to station defensive troops, disbelieved his own intelligence agencies, and executed German communists who gave their lives to warn the USSR about the imminent invasion.
That’s what my comment is about.
None of that shit happened, get a job
You’re just a Republican shouting fake news. Pathetic.
And you’re just a republican regurgitating misinformation
Lol right, everything bad is republicans, except when it’s really bad then it’s russian and/or chinese.
You think there are republicans on this website??
You think republicans would defend Stalin, lmao??
Jesus fucking christ.
Removed by mod
His only choice was to sign a treaty with Hitler, because Britain and France refused to become allies with Stalin. Britain and France thought it best to let the communists and fascists fight it out and hopefully destroy each other.
Stalin signed a non aggression pact and then began rapidly industrializing his country, knowing dman well that Hitler would eventually break the treaty.
Then Stalin defeated the Nazis.
Yeah Hitler forced him to take half of Poland as well right?
It’s very fucking telling how mad you people get that Stalin didn’t let Hitler have all of Poland. Literally whining that the holocaust wasn’t even worse.
Particularly monstrous when you remember most of that territory was just Ukrainian under polish occupation
The half that Poland took from the Soviets in 1921?
The half the Soviets tried to take from Poland 1918-1921.
Do you think before you type?
Because it sounds like you’re saying it’s okay to ally with the Nazis as long as your motivation is vengeance
Do you not know how to read? That’s not what I’m saying at all, lmao.
You went off on a tangent. My point was why he believed Hitler, not why he allied with him.
Did he? Seemed like he was preparing to go to war with Germany for a long long time, lol.
Removed by mod
Kay?
Anything’s possible when you make shit up
Removed by mod
If you’re an ahistorical imperial propaganda enjoyer, sure, I guess?
Double genocide theory is literal fascist propaganda, which even has its own Wikipedia page, lmao.
Removed by mod
And you’re saying that that excess mortality is the same as the systematic genocide of over 10 million people by Nazi Germany? That makes you a Nazi apologist and a holocost trivializer. Very lib of you, lol.
Removed by mod
Lmao. To know someone as stupid as you thinks I’m a moron makes me immensely proud. Re read that double genocide theory page and understand that you are repeating literal historically documented fascist propaganda.
Removed by mod
Lmao, die fascist.
Removed by mod
By “divvy up Poland”, you mean “soviet land that Poland took in the early 1920s”, I’m sure.
Your knowledge of history seems entirely non existent, besides “enemies of my capitalist imperialist genocidal empire are bad and have always been bad, despite literally saving the world from the Nazis”
Removed by mod
Lmao, yeah buddy, any history book. Maybe start with a glance at the Wikipedia page
Removed by mod
👍
Removed by mod
Why don’t you fucking do some reading, and tell me.
Get new material
Removed by mod
Classic .ml drivel
History is .ml drivel? Sounds very liberal of you, lol.
Removed by mod
Gargle them yourself, you fucking lazy liberal.
Removed by mod
?? That’s not what I said at all, I said suck your own nuts, fucking lazy removed lol. Not a big reader are you?
Removed by mod
He also aided the Nazis in their fight against German communists and hurt China’s revolution.
So a flawed person like the rest of us.
Wtf is this nonsense?
Gonna need some sources on both of these.
https://jacobin.com/2021/08/hitler-stalin-pact-nazis-communist-deportation-soviet
https://www.marxists.org/archive/james-clr/works/world/ch09.htm
https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1931/xx/stalchin1.htm
None of this is evidence, it’s just other people making the same dumbass claims
Given Trotsky is a primary source and the Jacobin article cites a primary source what would constitute as evidence to you?
Actual fucking evidence, duh. Trotsky telling a story is worth as much as you telling a story, fuck all.
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1925/03/14.htm
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1926/11/26.htm
Does this mean anything to you? As you know the KMT slaughter of communists came shortly after he urged them to stay.
What I’m seeing here is that the USSR as a whole decided to make it their official position to advise against Chinese communists giving up on the effort to co-opt the Kuomintang as a movement/organization, and you’re saying that somehow equates to Joseph Stalin personally doing harm to the Chinese communist revolution. I can’t think of anything I could possibly say to discredit you that would do a better job than this, thank you.
Anything’s possible when you make shit up