She was the victim in the case of her husband recording her without her consent. And he’s the victim in the case of their marriage breaking because of infidelity.
One wrong doesn’t justify another wrong.
Let me ask you - how far do you think he should be allowed to break the law in order to deliver punishment to his wife by his own hand?
no, I’m saying the alternative to men snapping and killing their partner is giving them a legal system where they can present evidence and get justice.
explain what revenge porn is, and why you think this is revenge porn.
EDIT for viewers at home :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenge_porn
it may shock some of you to know that evidence for divorce proceedings is not distrobution.
Explain to me why you’re clipping my comment out of context to try to make a point.
because you’re bending over backwards to frame someone abusing someone else in a legal system as being the victim.
She was the victim in the case of her husband recording her without her consent. And he’s the victim in the case of their marriage breaking because of infidelity.
One wrong doesn’t justify another wrong.
Let me ask you - how far do you think he should be allowed to break the law in order to deliver punishment to his wife by his own hand?
… This is the societal compromise, you get evidence that someone cheated on you instead of murdering them.
I’m asking you how far do you think he should be allowed to break the law in order to deliver punishment to his wife for cheating?
You really think murder is justified in the case of cheating?
no, I’m saying the alternative to men snapping and killing their partner is giving them a legal system where they can present evidence and get justice.
Men are capable of controlling their actions.
Murdering your wife because she cheated isn’t the only other option to recording someone having sex without consent.
thanks