The vast majority of Israelis say they are not troubled by reports of famine and suffering in Gaza, a new poll released by the Israel Democracy Institute shows.

The survey shows that 79 percent of Jews in Israel were not troubled, or troubled at all, whereas 86 percent of “Arab” respondents were somewhat or very troubled by the reports about the war on Gaza.

The survey was conducted between 27-31 July.

  • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Remember when the US beat the Nazis? This is exactly like that, but instead imagine we sent the Nazis billions of dollars and weapons to enable them.

    • buttnugget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yep. The Nazis were people just like anyone else who gained the consent of the population. We learned nothing.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Honestly, even just being allowed to sink or swim on their own would have prevented this. They’ve grown brutal and callous because the US has shielded them from any consequences of that.

      • Dagwood_Sanwich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        20 years of being attacked by Hamas did that. Before Israel became anyone’s ally, they won multiple wars against multiple Islamic nations at the same time. Every single one of those wars would have ended in a second Holocaust if the Muslims had won.

        • krunklom@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          imagine being in school and theres a boy thats mean to you, we can call him billy Palestine.

          one day Billy Palestine pushes past you at recess and tou fall over and scrape your knee. Billy Palestine probably shouldnt have done that. It was mean.

          But you dont push Billy back, no. The nect day at recess you chop his dick and balls off with a rusty mest cleaver and stuff them in his fucking mouth and assrape the shit out of him in fill view of the school before finally cutting off his head and leaving him right there on the playground.

          Imagine defending this.

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The second holocaust is happening right now and it’s all thanks to the terrorists who founded israel, violently removing Palestinians from their homes, and setting the blueprint for the entire existence of the cancer known as israel. Palestine is only the beginning in the israelis’ campaign of lebensraum, they have a whole plan of “greater israel” that they’re looking forward to implementing.

    • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Don’t mistake government-controlled or government-aligned media propaganda with the actual civilian populace.

      Would you trust Netanyahu’s allies to put out fair, representative journalism about what is important to the general population?

    • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Russia said the same exact thing about Ukraine… maybe this is not a wise option in general.

        • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Russia accused them of a genocide in Donbass.

          The point is that trying to rebuild countries is usually a very bad idea, especially by force. Germany and Japan after WWII are very rare examples in history.

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Congratulations to israel for making the very rare examples list then.

  • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Middle East Eye is a notorious propaganda outlet, especially on this conflict. I would take anything they say with a grain of salt, including their interpretations of polls and surveys. I personally recommend everybody here to actually look at the original source and the same information referenced directly from there. The survey cited in this article is pretty extensive, and I think it’s worth taking a look at:

    https://en.idi.org.il/articles/60357

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Sir, this is Lemmy. Get your information hygiene out of there!

      …Seriously though, subtle rewording makes a huge difference:

      The majority of Jewish respondents think that, given the circumstances of the fighting in Gaza, Israel is making efforts to avoid causing suffering to the Palestinian population there. The majority of Arab respondents think that even with the restrictions imposed by the fighting, Israel could have done more to reduce this suffering. Among Jews, only on the Left is there a majority who think that Israel is not making the necessary efforts to reduce suffering.

      On a personal level, the majority in the Center and on the Right (Jewish respondents) say that they are not troubled by the reports of famine and suffering among the Palestinian population in Gaza. On the Left, the majority reported that they are personally troubled by these reports.

      The majority of the Jewish public believes the IDF’s reporting on the extent of Palestinian civilian casualties in Gaza

      In other words, Jewish respondents believe Israel is making efforts to avoid suffering, not that they approve of the suffering, and the national mood is very low.

      Propaganda works.

      So do clickbait tabloid headlines.

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Sorry bud, the original source doesn’t make Israelis look better.

        Israelis think that because they believe the IDF. You literally just read the first paragraph and are acting like the responsible one doing real research.

  • herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Israel is full of religious fanatics who would happily kill everyone on this planet. Have you heard of Operation Samson?

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      It’s the Samson option, they’ve never done it. And MAD has been policy for any number of nations.

      Is Israel deep into an ethnic conflict spiral, and fairly devoid of empathy for the other side? Yes. Is it all religious fanatics? No, that’s a minority. Secular Zionism is a thing too.

      • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        The Samson option is far worse than mutually assured destruction. Instead of retaliatory strikes against the sole country which launches nukes first, Isreal plans to nuke major cities all around the globe if they are ever nuked. They have already used this threat to coerce other countries into supporting them.

        In the 1973 Yom Kippur War, Arab forces were overwhelming Israeli forces and Prime Minister Golda Meir authorized a nuclear alert and ordered 13 atomic bombs be readied for use by missiles and aircraft. The Israeli Ambassador informed President Nixon that “very serious conclusions” may occur if the United States did not airlift supplies. Nixon complied. This is seen by some commentators on the subject as the first threat of the use of the Samson Option.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          This is also in there:

          against a country whose military has invaded and/or destroyed much of Israel.

          I’ve never heard anyone else suggest it would be aimless.

          • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Sure, it would include countries which threaten them directly, but it is not limited to that. As per the quoted section, Israel’s government has already threatened to nuke the USA if we did not continue supplying them with military aid. There is a reason this policy is not just called MAD. It’s something entirely different.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              I would interpret that paragraph as a threat to nuke Arab countries (13 times, maybe), which would be bad, and would also have major political and economic fallout for Nixon. Threatening the use of nukes against a non-nuclear country is questionable, but I think it’s also the US policy if invaded.

              I had assumed it was just called that for the Jewishness. The story of Samson is pretty MAD-ish, except that I don’t think his captors were warned - killing a bunch of Philistines was the point, because it was the bad old days.

              Come to think of it, did/do they even have a way of delivering nukes outside the region?

              • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                16 hours ago

                Here’s another article which contains more quotes from the same book Wikipedia cites:

                This doctrine is still in place today, as journalist Kit Klarenberg noted, “Dutch-born Israeli military theorist Martin van Creveld boasted in September 2003” that “We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets…We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under”.

                https://the307.substack.com/p/the-samson-option-how-israel-not

                Edit regarding your question: Yes, Isreal has multiple delivery options.

                Officials confirm that the nation can now launch atomic weapons from land, sea and air.

                • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  Hmm, a bit of a suspect source. And I can’t find the primary source of this quote.

                  It does look like some of their boats and ships have global range, at least. If the Martin van Creveld quote is authentic, that would imply Rome is the edge of their missile range, which would make sense. I’m guessing Iran is just about as far.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Israel is a extremely racist nation and Palestinians are just “human animals” and even “vermin” to most Israelis.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    When I went to Israel last time I was genuinely surprised how many zealots there are. Most Israelis you meet outside of the country are just normal people but Israel itself is still full of mentally deranged. Religion is a hell of a drug.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      21 hours ago

      If you really mean Israelis outside of Israel and not just Jewish people, that’s probably just code shifting. They know their opinions aren’t acceptable outside their bubble, so they keep quiet. It’s the same way a white supremacist will talk differently if they think any random white guy shares their views vs when an imposing minority is in the room.

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        18 hours ago

        My long-time ex was Jewish, can confirm. They were alright but their zionist relatives absolutely dropped some fucking bombs (proverbial, probably literal now) during family gatherings. The mildest was the tired old “part of being a good Jew is supporting Israel” ranging up to “Palestinians are subhuman and should be exterminated”. Mind, this was over twenty years ago and the situation has demonstrably escalated since.

      • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I think it’s a little different. The Israelis who actually live or travel outside of Israel tend to usually be the educated, open minded ones. They’re usually the ones who want a two state solution and oppose wars. The whackos tend to stay in Israel. Not all Israelis are whackos, but all the Israeli whackos stay in Israel. It’s kind of like how the Americans who travel or live abroad tend to be liberal, but the MAGA types never even leave the country.

        • jouhija@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          So how come there are tons of Israeli groups abroad from Israel who push zionist propaganda?

          They need to renounce their bullshit faith or be ready to take in the backlash. It’s all made up (all religions), anyway, and if one can’t see that they really don’t deserve to procreate on this earth

          • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I mean some do and some don’t. It’s the same as any other nationality. Israelis aren’t a monolith.

    • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The reason for this is that Israel has a lot of ultra orthodox Jews, and they can be pinpointed as THE source of the insanity inside the country. They don’t contribute economically, they’re always calling for wars and violence but they refuse to participate in the military, they throw tantrums when anything doesn’t go their way, and they’re always trying to coerce society to be more religiously extreme.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah it’s so disappointing to see a culture being held hostage by extremists. It’s almost like west Asia can never fucking escape these zealots ruining it for everybody.

        As someone wirh west Asian roots I wonder how incredible the region would be without religion.

    • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      This is the type of unhinged take that shouldn’t be welcomed in discourse. The reason why people are critical of Israel or Russia or Saudi Arabia or Iran or whatever is because they’re not bothered enough by the death and suffering. The whole point is to get them to deradicalize as a society so they won’t dehumanize other people. We went to bring them to the level everybody else is at, radicalizing ourselves to dehumanize them, that’s just making the problem worse.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes, poll after poll has shown this. Israelis by and large are behind the genocide. They’re okay with it they approve of it and they like it. They’re not being forced to murder an entire people. They’re gleeful about it.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      A nation of mostly fascists. Zionism is about the creation of a religious nationalist ethnostate through genocide.

      It’s pure unbridled fascism, and Israelis have been indoctrinated to believe it’s okay when they do it since birth, as has a significant proportion of the Jewish diaspora. That’s why the genocide continues, and why Israel is the most dangerous threat to Jewish people since Nazism.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not quite. Zionism is about creating a secular nationalist ethnostate through genocide, with religious dressing simply as a way to get more religious Jews on board. It’s no coincidence that early Zionist leaders were all unapologetically atheist.

        • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          That’s not true. Zionism originates from the Jewish scriptures. Basically, Judaism talks about how Jews were promised by God, via the scriptures and the old prophets, the land of Israel as a homeland. It is the duty of Jews to resettle the holy land and establish a theological society that is based on the divine laws and systems laid out in the Torah. By doing so, Jews would achieve salvation for themselves, and eventually for the rest of the world. This global salvation will be marked by global harmony and the coming of the messiah who will guide the world in the path of God.

          Virtually all Jews agree that Israel is their homeland and that they will eventually reclaim the holy land and settle it in a way that would bring salvation as they await the coming of the Messiah. Traditionally Zionism was seen as something that is out of human control and is entirely up to God’s will. Essentially Jews will go back to Israel when God wills it and people have no say in the matter, any attempt by humans to accelerate the salvation is seen as blasphemous as it’s an act of rebellion against God’s will.

          That’s when modern Zionism split. Modern Zionists believe that political and secular Zionism is a tool given by God to enact his divine plan and to initiate the return of Jews back the land of Israel. Therefore following this type of Zionism is actually following God’s will and it’s the duty of religious Jews to pursue it.

          Obviously, there’s a great deal of debate among Jews about which theological branch is correct, but either way, the origins of Zionism aren’t purely secular or nationalist.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Modern Zionists believe that political and secular Zionism is a tool given by God to enact his divine plan and to initiate the return of Jews back the land of Israel.

            Early modern Zionists (including Herzl himself) overwhelmingly didn’t believe in God in the first place.

            Obviously, there’s a great deal of debate among Jews about which theological branch is correct, but either way, the origins of Zionism aren’t purely secular or nationalist.

            You should look up Theodor Herzl. Early Zionists were straight up voting on whether they’d build their Jewish state in Palestine or Uganda, and the vote was pretty narrow if I’m not mistaken. The rationale for choosing Palestine was that it’d be easier to get religious Jews (which the guys who were thinking up this stuff were absolutely not) on board. Like, do you think Ben Gurion or Golda Mier were having theological debates?

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think there’s been a pretty significant divergence from the original Zionist leaders to modern day Zionism. The seeds were there, obviously, but things have deteriorated even further in the past few decades.

      • Blubber28@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I will never claim that all jews are bad because Israel is fucked up, nor will I ever claim that all catholics are bad because of the Spanish Inquisition or all muslims are bad because of the terrorists. It is true that not all people who follow those religions are bad.

        However, one cannot deny the religious motivations. They are doing this because they believe that their sky daddy promised them that land, just like the catholics who did commit the inquisition believed their sky daddy wanted a pure catholic europe, and the racidal muslims believe their sky daddy wants to punish unvelievers/misbelievers.

        • jouhija@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          If the only country that revolves around your religion is this evil, maybe it’s time to put a thinking cap on instead of whatever religious headwear you have and take a deep look into your soul

          And if after that you still think that whatever mumbo-jumbo you believe is all right then maybe it’s time to remove yourself from our collective gene pool

          • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            This is just ignorant. There’s only 14 million Jews in the world and 90% of them either live in the US or Israel. If there were 1.9 billion Jews like there were muslims, for example, we would start seeing a bunch of different states that act very differently from other. I think most people can agree that Iran under the Mullah regime and Afghanistan under the Taliban are evil, but at the same time, there are also islamic countries like Albania and Kazakhstan that are pretty normal. Trying to judge all Jews off the actions off of the actions of Israel, it’s like judging all muslims off of the actions of Pakistan or all Christians off of the actions of Brazil. It’s just silly.

            • jouhija@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              It’s ignorant to call out dumbasses who believe in fairy tales? Okay then, haven’t seen this sort of Zionist propaganda before

              • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                No, there’s a difference between being critical of a religion and judging an entire religious demographic on the actions of a particular state.

                • jouhija@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  Nah, if you believe in mumbo jumbo you bet I’ll judge you as a less intelligent being. If you believe in some unprovable being that’s being used as a scapegoat for genocide you’re no better than the people committing said genocide

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          Technically it’s not explicitly about genocide, but here’s the big guy on the topic:

          As to al-Khalidi concerns about the non-Jewish majority population of Palestine, Herzl replied rhetorically: “who would think of sending them away?”

          - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_Herzl

          Again, this isn’t technically a genocidal idea in and of its own (though still crime against humanity stuff), but implementing it would inevitably wade pretty deep into genocide territory, as seen in the Nakba.

          • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            This seems to be a weak source.
            I have found a detailed article that claims that while the historical Zionism did mention relocating non-Jewish people, killing them was only a fringe opinion among ultra-nationalist religious people. But this opinion has been spreading with every major conflict until those extremists got power in the current government and was further accelerated by the October 7 attack. https://theconversation.com/in-israel-calls-for-genocide-have-migrated-from-the-margins-to-the-mainstream-250010

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 day ago

              As I said, Herzl wasn’t explicitly calling for total extermination here, but what he was calling for could only happen via genocide. This is why the Nakba included so many bloody massacres (which, yes, those constitute a genocide).

            • mrdown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              https://imeu.org/article/what-leading-israelis-have-said-about-the-nakba

              Herzl’s Diary, 12 June 1895

              The property owners will come over to our side. According to my conception, the majority of the local population will have to be transferred elsewhere.

              We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it any employment in our own country. - Herzl’s Diary, 12 June 1895

              Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly - Herzl’s Diary, 12 June 1895